A new business model for encouraging the adoption of electric vehicles in the absence of policy support

被引:48
作者
Nian, Victor [1 ]
Hari, M. P. [1 ]
Yuan, Jun [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Energy Studies Inst, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Shanghai Maritime Univ, China Inst FTZ Supply Chain, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Electric vehicle; Total cost of vehicle ownership; Business model; Dealer-buyer cost sharing; Worst case market environment; Transport policy; TOTAL-COST; INFRASTRUCTURE; TECHNOLOGIES; OWNERSHIP; HYBRID; MARKET; CHINA; CARS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.126
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The developments in electric vehicles (EVs) are driven by the need for cleaner and more efficient road transport. Despite the benefits of electrifying the transport sector, both EVs and internal combustion engine vehicles add to road congestion. Major cities around the world have thus employed vehicle control measures to rein the growth rate of vehicle populations. In the case of Singapore, heavy taxes are levied onto the purchase price of all vehicles registered and sold in the country making it literally the most expensive city to own a car. EVs are also penalized under the taxation scheme implemented in Singapore. The vehicle taxation schemes and the absence of incentive measures for EVs make Singapore the worst-case market environment for EV adoption. Through a dissection of Singapore's vehicle control measures, a new business model is proposed for promoting the adoption of EVs under Singapore's market environment. The proposed business model, inspired by telecommunication companies' mobile phone purchase contract aims at reducing the upfront purchase price of EVs via quasi-discount by vehicle dealers without affecting the transport sector tax revenues. Under a contractual arrangement over usage and electricity tariff managed by vehicle dealers, EV buyers effectively pay back the discounted upfront cost over a fixed period of time. Through an examination over a range of repayment periods and their impacts on costs, we find that the repayment period has virtually no impact on the total cost of vehicle ownership. We further contemplate that the same business model can be applicable to all cities in promoting the adoption of EVs without affecting the existing policy infrastructure.
引用
收藏
页码:1106 / 1117
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Government policy and the development of electric vehicles in Japan [J].
Åhman, M .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (04) :433-443
[2]  
[Anonymous], SING EN STAT 2017
[3]  
[Anonymous], P 2013 WORLD EL VEH
[4]  
Association JAM, 2009, FACT SHEET JAP GOV I
[5]   Economic and technical management of an aggregation agent for electric vehicles: a literature survey [J].
Bessa, Ricardo J. ;
Matos, Manuel A. .
EUROPEAN TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL POWER, 2012, 22 (03) :334-350
[6]  
Bloomberg, 2017, BLOOMB TERM
[7]   Business models for sustainable technologies: Exploring business model evolution in the case of electric vehicles [J].
Bohnsack, Rene ;
Pinkse, Jonatan ;
Kolk, Ans .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (02) :284-300
[8]  
Bradley M.J, 2018, ELECT VEHICLE COST B
[9]   Perspectives of electric mobility: Total cost of ownership of electric vehicles in Germany [J].
Bubeck, Steffen ;
Tomaschek, Jan ;
Fahl, Ulrich .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2016, 50 :63-77
[10]   Can innovative business models overcome resistance to electric vehicles? Better Place and battery electric cars in Denmark [J].
Christensen, Thomas Budde ;
Wells, Peter ;
Cipcigan, Liana .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 48 :498-505