Head elevation and laryngeal mask airway Supreme insertion: A randomized controlled trial

被引:6
作者
Park, Jun-Young [1 ]
Yu, Jihion [1 ]
Hong, Jun Hyuk [2 ]
Hwang, Jai-Hyun [1 ]
Kim, Young-Kug [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
fibreoptic bronchoscopic grade; head elevation; laryngeal mask airway; transurethral resection of bladder tumour; OROPHARYNGEAL LEAK PRESSURE; CONTROLLED VENTILATION; ADULT PATIENTS; CROSS-OVER; ANESTHESIA; POSITION; PROSEAL; VIEW;
D O I
10.1111/aas.13742
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background A laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is usually inserted by conventional 7 cm head elevation. However, little is known about the association of head elevation degree and LMA insertion. We hypothesized that 14 cm head elevation would increase the first attempt success rate of LMA Supreme insertion compared with conventional 7 cm head elevation in patients undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumour. Methods Patients were randomly allocated to the high group (n = 55, 14 cm head elevation) or the control group (n = 55, conventional 7 cm head elevation). The primary outcome was the first attempt success rate of LMA Supreme insertion. Results The first attempt success rate was significantly higher in the high group than in the control group (53 [96.4%] vs 40 [72.7%], P = .001, relative risk = 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12-1.57, absolute risk reduction = 23.7%). Fibreoptic bronchoscope grade 4 (ie optimal position of the LMA) was significantly higher in the high group (35 [64.8%] vs 18 [36.7%], P = .004, relative risk = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.16-2.68, absolute risk reduction = 30.9%). Conclusions Head elevation of 14 cm height increased the first attempt success rate of LMA Supreme insertion and fibreoptic bronchoscopic grade in patients undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumour. High head elevation can be an effective option for successful LMA Supreme insertion. Trial Registry Number: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04229862).
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 350
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Bannister FB, 1944, LANCET, V2, P651
[2]   Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Belena, Jose M. ;
Nunez, Monica ;
Anta, Diego ;
Carnero, Maria ;
Gracia, Jose L. ;
Ayala, Jose L. ;
Alvarez, Raquel ;
Yuste, Javier .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 30 (03) :119-123
[3]   AIRWAY PATENCY IN THE UNCONSCIOUS PATIENT [J].
BOIDIN, MP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1985, 57 (03) :306-310
[4]   THE LARYNGEAL MASK - A NEW CONCEPT IN AIRWAY MANAGEMENT [J].
BRAIN, AIJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1983, 55 (08) :801-805
[5]   LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY INSERTION - A COMPARISON OF THE STANDARD VERSUS NEUTRAL POSITION IN NORMAL-PATIENTS WITH A VIEW TO ITS USE IN CERVICAL-SPINE INSTABILITY [J].
BRIMACOMBE, J ;
BERRY, A .
ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 48 (08) :670-671
[6]  
BRIMACOMBE J, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, P457
[7]   INSERTION OF THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF 4 TECHNIQUES [J].
BRIMACOMBE, J ;
BERRY, A .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1993, 21 (01) :89-92
[8]   The cuffed oropharyngeal airway vs. the laryngeal mask airway: a randomised cross-over study of oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic view in paralysed patients [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Keller, C .
ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (07) :683-685
[9]   Comparison of clinical performance of size 1.5 Supreme LMA and Proseal LMA among Asian children: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Chaw, Sook Hui ;
Shariffuddin, Ina I. ;
Foo, Li Lian ;
Lee, Pui Kuan ;
Paran, Ramona Maya ;
Cheang, Peak Chee ;
Chan, Lucy .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2018, 32 (06) :1093-1099
[10]   Use of the intubating laryngeal mask airway in the emergency department: A ten-year retrospective review [J].
Driver, Brian E. ;
Martel, Marc ;
Lai, Tarissa ;
Marko, Tracy A. ;
Reardon, Robert F. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 38 (07) :1367-1372