Accuracy of measuring half- and quarter-value layers and appropriate aperture width of a convenient method using a lead-covered case in X-ray computed tomography

被引:14
作者
Matsubara, Kosuke [1 ]
Ichikawa, Katsuhiro [1 ]
Murasaki, Yuichi [2 ]
Hirosawa, Ayaka [2 ]
Koshida, Kichiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Kanazawa Univ, Inst Med Pharmaceut & Hlth Sci, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Quantum Med Technol, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 9200942, Japan
[2] Kanazawa Univ, Grad Sch Med, Grad Course Med Sci & Technol, Dept Quantum Med Technol, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 9200942, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2014年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
computed tomography; half-value layer; quarter-value layer; radiation dosage; ATTENUATION; CT;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v15i1.4602
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Determination of the half-value layer (HVL) and quarter-value layer (QVL) values is not an easy task in X-ray computed tomography (CT), because a nonrotating X-ray tube must be used, which requires the assistance of service engineers. Therefore, in this study, we determined the accuracy of the lead-covered case method, which uses X-rays from a rotating X-ray tube, for measuring the HVL and QVL in CT. The lead-covered case was manufactured from polystyrene foam and a 4 mm thick lead plate. The ionizing chamber was placed in the center of the case and aluminum filters were placed 15 cm above the aperture surface. Aperture widths of 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 cm for a tube voltage of 110 kV and an aperture width of 2.0 cm for the tube voltages of 80 and 130 kV were used to measure exposure doses. The results of the HVL and QVL were compared with those of the conventional nonrotating method. A 2.0 cm aperture was believed to be adequate, because of its small differences in the HVL and QVL in the nonrotating method and its reasonable exposure dose level. When the 2.0 cm aperture was used, the lead-covered case method demonstrated slightly larger HVLs and QVLs (0.03-0.06 mm for the HVL and 0.2-0.4 mm for the QVL) at all the tube voltage settings. However, the differences in the effective energy were 0.1-0.3 keV; therefore, it could be negligible in an organ-absorbed dose evaluation and a quality assurance test for CT.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 316
页数:8
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1995, 51 NAT M JAP SOC RAD
  • [2] I.C.o.R, 1992, 46 ICRU
  • [3] ICRU, 1989, TISSUE SUBSTITUTES R
  • [4] Koyama S, 2012, TXB MED DOSIMETRY PA, P55
  • [5] Measurement of half-value layer in x-ray CT: A comparison of two noninvasive techniques
    Kruger, RL
    McCollough, CH
    Zink, FE
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (08) : 1915 - 1919
  • [6] A simple method for evaluation of half-value layer variation in CT equipment
    Maia, AF
    Caldas, LVE
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (06) : 1595 - 1601
  • [7] An empirical model of diagnostic x-ray attenuation under narrow-beam geometry
    Mathieu, Kelsey B.
    Kappadath, S. Cheenu
    White, R. Allen
    Atkinson, E. Neely
    Cody, Dianna D.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (08) : 4546 - 4555
  • [8] The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents - X-ray attenuation
    McKetty, MH
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 1998, 18 (01) : 151 - 163