What parents want from doctors in end-of-life decision-making for children

被引:42
作者
Sullivan, J. [1 ,2 ]
Monagle, P. [3 ,4 ]
Gillam, L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Childrens Hosp, Childrens Bioeth Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3052, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth & Soc, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Royal Childrens Hosp, Dept Paediat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
BEREAVEMENT RESEARCH; HELPING PARENTS; CARE; PERSPECTIVES; ISSUES; FAMILY; DEATH; HARM;
D O I
10.1136/archdischild-2013-304249
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective End-of-life decision-making is difficult for everyone involved, as many studies have shown. Within this complexity, there has been little information on how parents see the role of doctors in end-of-life decision-making for children. This study aimed to examine parents' views and experiences of end-of-life decision-making. Design A qualitative method with a semistructured interview design was used. Setting Parent participants were living in the community. Participants Twenty-five bereaved parents. Main outcomes Parents reported varying roles taken by doctors: being the provider of information without opinion; giving information and advice as to the decision that should be taken; and seemingly being the decision maker for the child. The majority of parents found their child's doctor enabled them to be the ultimate decision maker for their child, which was what they very clearly wanted to be, and consequently enabled them to exercise their parental autonomy. Parents found it problematic when doctors took over decision-making. A less frequently reported, yet significant role for doctors was to affirm decisions after they had been made by parents. Other important aspects of the doctor's role were to provide follow-up support and referral. Conclusions Understanding the role that doctors take in end-of-life decisions, and the subsequent impact of that role from the perspective of parents can form the basis of better informed clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 220
页数:5
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], THE MONTHLY JUL
  • [2] Beauchamp Tom L., 2019, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, V8
  • [3] Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
  • [4] Brinchmann BS, 2005, NEWBORN INFANT NURS, V5, P77, DOI 10.1053/j.nainr.2005.03.005
  • [5] Infant end-of-life care: the parents' perspective
    Brosig, C. L.
    Pierucci, R. L.
    Kupst, M. J.
    Leuthner, S. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2007, 27 (08) : 510 - 516
  • [6] Browning David, 2002, Bioethics Forum, V18, P23
  • [7] Qualitative bereavement research: incongruity between the perspectives of participants and research ethics boards
    Buckle, Jennifer L.
    Dwyer, Sonya Corbin
    Jackson, Marlene
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2010, 13 (02) : 111 - 125
  • [8] Living with a Crucial Decision: A Qualitative Study of Parental Narratives Three Years after the Loss of Their Newborn in the NICU
    Caeymaex, Laurence
    Speranza, Mario
    Vasilescu, Caroline
    Danan, Claude
    Bourrat, Marie-Michele
    Garel, Micheline
    Jousselme, Catherine
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (12):
  • [9] Carnevale Franco A, 2006, J Child Health Care, V10, P69
  • [10] Parental refusals of medical treatment: The harm principle as threshold for state intervention
    Diekema, DS
    [J]. THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS, 2004, 25 (04) : 243 - 264