Psychometric properties of the Pandemic-Related Pregnancy Stress Scale (PREPS)

被引:64
作者
Preis, Heidi [1 ]
Mahaffey, Brittain [2 ]
Lobel, Marci [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Psychol, 100 Nicolls Rd, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Renaissance Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Hlth, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
COVID-19; prenatal maternal stress; pandemic-related pregnancy stress; psychometrics; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1080/0167482X.2020.1801625
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Purpose Pregnant women are facing numerous COVID-19 related burdens including social isolation, financial insecurity, uncertainty about the impact of the virus on fetal development, and prenatal care restrictions. We tested the psychometric properties of a new instrument designed to assess the extent and types of pandemic-related stress experienced by pregnant women. Materials and methods 4,451 pregnant women from across the U.S. were recruitedviasocial media and completed an online questionnaire in April-May 2020. The questionnaire included measures of psychological, sociodemographic, and obstetric factors and the new Pandemic-Related Pregnancy Stress Scale (PREPS). Results Confirmatory factor analyses of the PREPS showed excellent model fit. Three factors - Perinatal Infection Stress (5 items), Preparedness Stress (7 items), and Positive Appraisal (3 items) - converged and diverged with expected psychological factors, and scales created from these factors demonstrated acceptable to good reliability (alpha's 0.68-0.86). In addition, mean PREPS scores were associated with perceived risk of infection, and with financial and vocational COVID-19 related burdens. Conclusion The PREPS is a robust instrument to assess multidimensional COVID-19 pandemic prenatal stress. It is a valuable tool for future research to examine vulnerability to pandemic stress and how this stress may affect women and their offspring.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 197
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   The COVID-19 pandemic, psychological stress during pregnancy, and risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring: a neglected consequence [J].
Abdoli, Amir ;
Falahi, Shahab ;
Kenarkoohi, Azra ;
Shams, Morteza ;
Mir, Hamed ;
Jahromi, Mirza Ali Mofazzal .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 41 (03) :247-248
[2]  
Arbuckle, 2014, AMOS
[3]  
Browne MW, 1993, TESTING STRUCTURAL E, P136, DOI DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005
[4]  
Campbell Andrew M, 2020, Forensic Sci Int Rep, V2, P100089, DOI 10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100089
[5]   The relationships of social support, uncertainty, self-efficacy, and commitment to prenatal psychosocial adaptation [J].
Choi, W. H. Hui ;
Lee, G. L. ;
Chan, Celia H. Y. ;
Cheung, Ray Y. H. ;
Lee, Irene L. Y. ;
Chan, Cecilia L. W. .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2012, 68 (12) :2633-2645
[6]   Weathering the storm: Hurricanes and birth outcomes [J].
Currie, Janet ;
Rossin-Slater, Maya .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2013, 32 (03) :487-503
[7]  
De Freytas-Tamura K., 2020, NY TIMES
[8]   When stress happens matters: Effects of earthquake timing on stress responsivity in pregnancy [J].
Glynn, LM ;
Wadhwa, PD ;
Dunkel-Schetter, C ;
Chicz-DeMet, A ;
Sandman, CA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 184 (04) :637-642
[9]  
Gupta S., PREGNANT PANDEMIC
[10]   Cross-cultural comparison of levels of childbirth-related fear in an Australian and Swedish sample [J].
Haines, Helen ;
Pallant, Julie F. ;
Karlstrom, Annika ;
Hildingsson, Ingegerd .
MIDWIFERY, 2011, 27 (04) :560-567