Effectiveness of Ureteroscopy-Assisted Retrograde Nephrostomy (UARN) for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

被引:10
作者
Kawahara, Takashi [1 ,2 ]
Ito, Hiroki [1 ,2 ]
Terao, Hideyuki [1 ]
Kato, Yoshitake [1 ]
Uemura, Hiroji [2 ]
Kubota, Yoshinobu [2 ]
Matsuzaki, Junichi [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohguchi Higashi Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[2] Yokohama City Univ, Dept Urol, Grad Sch Med, Yokohama, Kanagawa 232, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2012年 / 7卷 / 12期
关键词
SUPINE VALDIVIA; COMPLICATIONS; CLASSIFICATION; REMOVAL; LITHOTRIPSY; POSITION; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0052149
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the impact of ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy (UARN) during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Materials and Methods: From April 2009 to September 2011, a total of 50 patients underwent PCNL for large renal stones (stone burden > 2 cm). We performed UARN in the Galdakao-modified Valdivia position for 27 patients (UARN PCNL) and ultrasonography-assisted percutaneous nephrostomy in the prone position for 23 patients (prone PCNL). Results: UARN PCNL significantly improved the stone-free rate (81.5% vs 52.2%) and the rate of residual stones (< 4 mm, 92.6% vs 65.2%, P < 0.05). The median length of the operation was significantly shorter for UARN PCNL, at 160 min, compared to 299 min for prone PCNL (P < 0.001). There was one intraoperative complication in prone PCNL, namely a hemorrhage that resulted in stopping the initial treatment, but it was cured conservatively. The postoperative complications included a high grade fever that persisted for three days in two UARN PCNL patients (7.4%) and six prone PCNL patients (26.1%). The Clavien grading scores showed significantly lower postoperative complications for UARN PCNL compared to prone PCNL. Conclusion: UARN is associated with a higher stone-free rate, shorter operation time, and fewer complications during PCNL than prone PCNL.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [11] PERCUTANEOUS TROCAR (NEEDLE) NEPHROSTOMY IN HYDRONEPHROSIS
    GOODWIN, WE
    CASEY, WC
    WOOLF, W
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1955, 157 (11): : 891 - 894
  • [12] RETROGRADE NEPHROSTOMY AND PERCUTANEOUS CALCULUS REMOVAL IN 30 PATIENTS
    HUNTER, PT
    FINLAYSON, B
    DRYLIE, DM
    LEAL, J
    HAWKINS, IF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1985, 133 (03) : 369 - 374
  • [13] Supine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access
    Ibarluzea, Gaspar
    Scoffone, Cesare M.
    Cracco, Cecilia M.
    Poggio, Massimiliano
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Terrone, Carlo
    Astobieta, Ander
    Camargo, Isabel
    Gamarra, Mikel
    Tempia, Augusto
    Uria, Jose G. Valdivia
    Scarpa, Roberto Mario
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 100 (01) : 233 - 236
  • [14] Ibarluzea Gonzalez G, 2001, Arch Esp Urol, V54, P951
  • [15] Kawahara T, 2011, BJU INT
  • [16] Kawahara T, 2012, J ENDOUROLOGY B
  • [17] Ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy for lower calyx calculi in horseshoe kidney: Two case reports
    Takashi Kawahara
    Hiroki Ito
    Hideyuki Terao
    Katsuyuki Tanaka
    Takehiko Ogawa
    Hiroji Uemura
    Yoshinobu Kubota
    Junichi Matsuzaki
    [J]. Journal of Medical Case Reports, 6 (1)
  • [18] The Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: Classification of Complications
    Labate, Gaston
    Modi, Pranjal
    Timoney, Anthony
    Cormio, Luigi
    Zhang, Xiaochun
    Louie, Michael
    Grabe, Magnus
    de la Rosette, Jean
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (08) : 1275 - 1280
  • [19] RETROGRADE METHOD FOR PERCUTANEOUS ACCESS TO KIDNEY
    LAWSON, RK
    MURPHY, JB
    TAYLOR, AJ
    JACOBS, SC
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1983, 22 (06) : 580 - 582
  • [20] Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery in Galdakao-Modified Supine Valdivia Position: A New Standard for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy?
    Scoffone, Cesare M.
    Cracco, Cecilia M.
    Cossu, Marco
    Grande, Susanna
    Poggio, Massimiliano
    Scarpa, Roberto M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (06) : 1393 - 1403