Transcendental values and the valuation and management of ecosystem services

被引:100
作者
Raymond, Christopher M. [1 ]
Kenter, Jasper O. [2 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Landscape Architecture Planning & Management, Umea, Sweden
[2] SAMS, Laurence Mee Ctr Soc & Sea, Oban, Argyll, Scotland
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国自然环境研究理事会; 英国艺术与人文研究理事会;
关键词
Shared values; Deliberative valuation; Pro-environmental behaviour; Conservation planning; Participatory psychometrics; Value-belief-norm theory; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; DELIBERATIVE MONETARY VALUATION; VALUE ORIENTATIONS; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL VALUES; ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN; LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; INTENTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.018
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Despite the wealth of studies assessing values in relation to the management of ecosystem services, few studies have assessed transcendental values (TVs). TVs include ethical principles and desirable end states, such as 'a world at peace' or 'unity with nature' that transcend specific situations. We argue that TVs are important to consider in relation to ecosystem services because they: are implicit within ecosystem service valuations; directly and indirectly affect behaviour; influence the way we view knowledge and evidence; may be shared when more superficial values conflict; and underpin social representations. We demonstrate through case examples from the United Kingdom, Solomon Islands and Australia how they can be applied to the assessment of pro-environmental behaviour, how they might influence monetary valuations, and be affected by deliberative processes. TVs had direct effects on behavioural intention and significantly influenced willingness to pay. In contrast to conceptions of TVs as stable, in some cases deliberation led to significant change in TVs. We also observed indirect effects between TVs and constructs that mediate between TVs and behaviour, including beliefs and norms about conservation actions. We discuss the implications of the results for ecosystem valuation and management, including directions for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 257
页数:17
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]   Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: The case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation [J].
Ajzen, I ;
Brown, TC ;
Carvajal, F .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2004, 30 (09) :1108-1121
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]  
Ajzen I., 1980, Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, VPaperback, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, EC EC BIOD TEEB EC E
[5]  
[Anonymous], ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1990, The essentials of factor analysis
[7]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2006, ABS CENS POP HOUS
[8]   The Dual Route to Value Change: Individual Processes and Cultural Moderators [J].
Bardi, Anat ;
Goodwin, Robin .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 42 (02) :271-287
[9]  
Bayliss-Smith T, 2003, AMBIO, V32, P346, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2003)032[0346:RCAHOH]2.0.CO
[10]  
2