An Exploratory Study of Reactions to Bot Comments on GitHub

被引:3
|
作者
Farah, Juan Carlos [1 ]
Spaenlehauer, Basile [1 ]
Lu, Xinyang [2 ]
Ingram, Sandy [3 ]
Gillet, Denis [1 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Univ Appl Sci, Fribourg, Switzerland
来源
2022 IEEE/ACM 4TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON BOTS IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (BOTSE 2022) | 2022年
关键词
bots; humor; laugh; emoji; reactions; social coding platforms; GitHub; HUMOR;
D O I
10.1145/3528228.3528409
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The widespread use of bots to support software development makes social coding platforms such as GitHub a particularly rich source of data for the study of human-bot interaction. Software development bots are used to automate repetitive tasks, interacting with their human counterparts via comments posted on the various discussion interfaces available on such platforms. One type of interaction supported by GitHub involves reacting to comments using predefined emoji. To investigate how users react to bot comments, we conducted an observational study comprising 54 million GitHub comments, with a particular focus on comments that elicited the laugh reaction. The results from our analysis suggest that some reaction types are not equally distributed across human and bot comments and that a bot's design and purpose influence the types of reactions it receives. Furthermore, while the laugh reaction is not exclusively used to express laughter, it can be used to convey humor when a bot behaves unexpectedly. These insights could inform the way bots are designed and help developers equip them with the ability to recognize and recover from unanticipated situations. In turn, bots could better support the communication, collaboration, and productivity of teams using social coding platforms.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 22
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An in-depth study of the promises and perils of mining GitHub
    Eirini Kalliamvakou
    Georgios Gousios
    Kelly Blincoe
    Leif Singer
    Daniel M. German
    Daniela Damian
    Empirical Software Engineering, 2016, 21 : 2035 - 2071
  • [22] A Comparative Study of the Effects of Pull Request on GitHub Projects
    Liu, Jing
    Li, Jiahao
    He, Lulu
    PROCEEDINGS 2016 IEEE 40TH ANNUAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE WORKSHOPS, VOL 1, 2016, : 313 - 322
  • [23] An in-depth study of the promises and perils of mining GitHub
    Kalliamvakou, Eirini
    Gousios, Georgios
    Blincoe, Kelly
    Singer, Leif
    German, Daniel M.
    Damian, Daniela
    EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2016, 21 (05) : 2035 - 2071
  • [24] Human, bot or both? A study on the capabilities of classification models on mixed accounts
    Cassee, Nathan
    Kitsanelis, Christos
    Constantinou, Eleni
    Serebrenik, Alexander
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AND EVOLUTION (ICSME 2021), 2021, : 654 - 658
  • [25] An Empirical Study on Using Multi-Labels for Issues in GitHub
    Kim, Jindae
    Lee, Seonah
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 134984 - 134997
  • [26] Personality of Clown Doctors An Exploratory Study
    Dionigi, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2016, 37 (01) : 49 - 55
  • [27] Open collaboration between universities and enterprises: a case study on GitHub
    Cheng, Xiufeng
    Zhang, Ziming
    Yang, Yue
    Yan, Zhonghua
    INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 30 (04) : 1251 - 1279
  • [28] An Empirical Study on Workflows and Security Policies in Popular GitHub Repositories
    Ayala, Jessy
    Garcia, Joshua
    2023 IEEE/ACM 1ST INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SOFTWARE VULNERABILITY, SVM, 2023, : 6 - 9
  • [29] An empirical study of ChatGPT-related projects and their issues on GitHub
    Lin, Zheng
    Zhang, Neng
    Liu, Chao
    Zheng, Zibin
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2025, 267
  • [30] Study the correlation between the readme file of GitHub projects and their popularity
    Wang, Tianlei
    Wang, Shaowei
    Chen, Tse-Hsun
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2023, 205