Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery: an Australian experience

被引:3
作者
Roberts, Jay [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Jason [3 ,4 ]
Haxhimolla, Hodo [3 ,4 ]
Kua, Boon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Redcliffe Hosp, Urol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Wesley Hosp, Urol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Canberra Hosp, Urol, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[4] Natl Capital Private Hosp, Urol, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
laparoscopy; oncology; nephrectomy; RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; FOLLOW-UP; TUMORS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/ans.13117
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes from our initial experience with laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery (LNSS) for small renal masses in Australian practice. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on an initial 50 patients undergoing LNSS. All procedures performed between April 2006 and September 2012 were included with median follow-up of 30 months. Outcomes measured were: positive surgical margin, warm ischaemic time, total operative time, blood transfusion and complications in the first 30 days after surgery. Results: The mean age of patients was 57 years. The mean pre-operative creatinine was 85 mu mol/L and the mean post-operative creatinine was 89 mu mol/L. Sixty-four per cent of the tumours were malignant tumours. The mean size of tumours was 2.5 cm. There were two malignant positive surgical margins on histology. The mean total operative time was 224 min and the mean warm ischaemic time was 24 min. Nine patients had complications with Clavien-Dindo grade III or lower. There was no grade IV or V complication. No patients were lost to follow-up and there have been no tumour recurrences to date. Conclusions: LNSS is emerging as a viable alternative to open NSS for small renal tumours with lower morbidity and equivalent oncological and functional outcomes. There is, however, a steep learning curve associated with the procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:926 / 929
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], GUIDELINES RENAL CEL
  • [2] [Anonymous], GUIDELINE MANAGEMENT
  • [3] Complications of Laparoscopic Surgery for Renal Masses: Prevention, Management, and Comparison with the Open Experience
    Breda, Alberto
    Finelli, Antonio
    Janetschek, Gunter
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Montorsi, Francesco
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (04) : 836 - 850
  • [4] Solid renal tumors: An analysis of pathological features related to tumor size
    Frank, I
    Blute, ML
    Cheville, JC
    Lohse, CM
    Weaver, AL
    Zincke, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (06) : 2217 - 2220
  • [5] Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Kavoussi, Louis R.
    Lane, Brian R.
    Blute, Michael L.
    Babineau, Denise
    Colombo, J. Roberto, Jr.
    Frank, Igor
    Permpongkosol, Sompol
    Weight, Christopher J.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Novick, Andrew C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (01) : 41 - 46
  • [6] Patterns of tumor recurrence and guidelines for followup after nephron sparing surgery for sporadic renal cell carcinoma
    Hafez, KS
    Novick, AC
    Campbell, SC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (06) : 2067 - 2070
  • [7] Integration of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy into an Australian public hospital: three-year follow-up of our initial 50 cases
    Jack, Gregory S.
    Lua, Mabel
    Chan, Yee
    Bolton, Damien M.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 : 35 - 39
  • [8] Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Technique, oncologic efficacy, and safety
    Johnston W.K.
    Wolf J.S.
    [J]. Current Urology Reports, 2005, 6 (1) : 19 - 28
  • [9] Impact of positive surgical margins in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumours
    Kwon, Eric O.
    Carver, Brett S.
    Snyder, Mark E.
    Russo, Paul
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 99 (02) : 286 - 289
  • [10] Lau WKO, 2000, MAYO CLIN PROC, V75, P1236