Capturing Value From Innovation-Diverging Views of R&D and Marketing Managers

被引:13
作者
Fischer, Timo [1 ]
Henkel, Joachim [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Management, D-80333 Munich, Germany
关键词
Appropriability mechanisms; communications equipment; discrete choice experiments; innovation; marketing-R&D interface; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY-RIGHTS; PROBIT COEFFICIENTS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; MIXED LOGIT; SELF-ESTEEM; MODELS; TECHNOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; INTEGRATION; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2012.2190143
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Profiting from technological innovation requires both the development of new products and the capture or appropriation of profits from them. For new product development, the interplay of marketing and R&D has been intensively researched. In contrast, for capturing value, this interplay has been largely neglected in the literature. To fill this gap, we study choices by marketing and R&D managers regarding activities aimed at appropriating profits from new products. We study, in detail, how managers perceive the effectiveness of product-related patents, overall patent portfolio size, marketing, sales and services quality, lead time, and contributions to open standards. We conducted discrete choice experiments with 143 managers working in R&D or marketing functions in upper and middle management in a leading communications equipment firm, and analyzed the resulting data by comparing marginal effects of rank-ordered mixed logit models between the two groups. We find that choices of R&D and marketing functions on how to capture the most value differ strongest on the mechanism that is perceived as most important by R&D managers, "lead time advantages." Top management needs to consider and deal with these diverging perceptions when formulating business strategies on value capture.
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 584
页数:13
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Ingroup bias and self-esteem: A meta-analysis [J].
Aberson, CL ;
Healy, M ;
Romero, V .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2000, 4 (02) :157-173
[2]   COLLECTIVE INVENTION [J].
ALLEN, RC .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1983, 4 (01) :1-24
[3]   Comparing logit and probit coefficients across groups [J].
Allison, PD .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1999, 28 (02) :186-208
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, W7552 NBER
[5]   Patent protection, complementary assets, and firms' incentives for technology licensing [J].
Arora, A ;
Ceccagnoli, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 52 (02) :293-308
[6]  
Arrow K., 1962, RATE DISCRETION INVE
[7]   The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation [J].
Arundel, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2001, 30 (04) :611-624
[8]   ASSESSING THE POTENTIAL DEMAND FOR ELECTRIC CARS [J].
BEGGS, S ;
CARDELL, S ;
HAUSMAN, J .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1981, 17 (01) :1-19
[9]   Intellectual property rights, strategic technology agreements and market structure - The case of GSM [J].
Bekkers, R ;
Duysters, G ;
Verspagen, B .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (07) :1141-1161
[10]   Top Management Team Diversity and Firm Performance: Moderators of Functional-Background and Locus-of-Control Diversity [J].
Boone, Christophe ;
Hendriks, Walter .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 55 (02) :165-180