Co-design of Digital Health Interventions for Young Adults: Protocol for a Scoping Review

被引:8
作者
Malloy, Jessica A. [1 ]
Partridge, Stephanie R. [2 ,3 ]
Kemper, Joya A. [4 ]
Braakhuis, Andrea [1 ]
Roy, Rajshri [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Discipline Nutr & Dietet, 85 Pk Rd, Auckland 1011, New Zealand
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Westmead Appl Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Prevent Res Collaborat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Canterbury, Sch Business, Dept Management Mkt & Entrepreneurship, Christchurch, New Zealand
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2022年 / 11卷 / 10期
关键词
digital health intervention; eHealth; mHealth; digital intervention; co-design; user participation; participatory research; participatory medicine; user feedback; participatory design; social media; web-based tool; young adult; youth; teenager; adolescent; review; protocol; search strategy; medical librarian; health librarian; library science; information science;
D O I
10.2196/38635
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Digital health interventions, including apps and web-based services, are on the rise due to their facilitated access to target groups. The constant evolution of technology calls for participatory research methodologies to understand youth expectations and the use of technology. The creative and collaborative nature of co-design allows for the active integration of youth desires and may enhance acceptability when it comes to digital health tools. Objective: The primary objective of this review is to assess the breadth of literature on digital health interventions that have been co-designed for and by young adults, including the types of available evidence, the identification of key characteristics relevant to young adult co-design, and the examination of research conduct in this space. Methods: The proposed scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Manual for Scoping Reviews. As well as the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist for reporting scoping reviews, an adaptation of Arksey and O'Malley's 6-stage framework for scoping reviews will be referenced. Peer-reviewed primary research, where young adults (aged 15-35 years) were actively involved in the design and development process of digital health interventions, will be collated for analyses. Five databases, including MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane, CINAHL Plus, Google Scholar, and Scopus, will be searched for relevant papers. Search strategies will be comprehensive to identify both published and unpublished literature. Relevant gray literature and secondary research will be excluded but pooled for separate analysis and citation chaining. Results will be presented in one or multiple forms, including narrative, tabular, or diagrammatic. Results: Data collection commenced in October 2021. Following data extraction according to the JBI results extraction instrument and independent quality assurance of included studies, a narrative synthesis of each paper included in the final pool will allow for data charting. As of May 2022, 19 papers are included for analysis. We expect the results to be published by autumn 2022. Conclusions: This protocol provides guidance for researchers who plan to conduct a similar style of investigation and promotes standardization of the scoping review process. We anticipate the provision of an overview of participatory digital health research involving young adults, highlighting any gaps in this research area, as well as potential areas for further study. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/38635
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [21] Scoping studies: advancing the methodology
    Levac, Danielle
    Colquhoun, Heather
    O'Brien, Kelly K.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2010, 5
  • [22] Young Adults' Use of Different Social Media Platforms for Health Information: Insights From Web-Based Conversations
    Lim, Megan S. C.
    Molenaar, Annika
    Brennan, Linda
    Reid, Mike
    McCaffrey, Tracy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (01)
  • [23] Adolescent Participation in Research, Policies and Guidelines for Chronic Disease Prevention: A Scoping Review Protocol
    Mandoh, Mariam
    Mihrshahi, Seema
    Cheng, Hoi Lun
    Redfern, Julie
    Partridge, Stephanie R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (21) : 1 - 10
  • [24] Mark S., 2020, Co-design in Aotearoa New Zealand: a Snapshot of the Literature
  • [25] Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
    Munn, Zachary
    Peters, Micah D. J.
    Stern, Cindy
    Tufanaru, Catalin
    McArthur, Alexa
    Aromataris, Edoardo
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [26] Strategies to Engage Adolescents in Digital Health Interventions for Obesity Prevention and Management
    Partridge, Stephanie R.
    Redfern, Julie
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2018, 6 (03)
  • [27] The invisible addiction: Cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students
    Roberts, James A.
    Petnji Yaya, Luc Honore
    Manolis, Chris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL ADDICTIONS, 2014, 3 (04) : 254 - 265
  • [28] Rothgangel Andreas, 2017, JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol, V4, pe2, DOI 10.2196/rehab.6761
  • [29] Co-Design as a Process of Joint Inquiry and Imagination
    Steen, Marc
    [J]. DESIGN ISSUES, 2013, 29 (02) : 16 - 28
  • [30] Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review
    Suarez-Lledo, Victor
    Alvarez-Galvez, Javier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (01)