Maternal benefits and risks of trial of labor versus elective repeat caesarean delivery in women with a previous caesarean delivery

被引:17
|
作者
Beucher, G. [1 ]
Dolley, P. [1 ]
Levy-Thissier, S. [1 ]
Florian, A. [1 ]
Dreyfus, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Caen, Serv Gynecol Obstet & Med Reprod, F-14033 Caen 9, France
来源
JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION | 2012年 / 41卷 / 08期
关键词
Previous caesarean; Elective repeat caesarean delivery; Trial of labor; Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery; Maternal morbidity; VAGINAL BIRTH; UTERINE RUPTURE; NEONATAL MORBIDITY; BLADDER INJURY; SECTION; OUTCOMES; TERM; METAANALYSIS; SUCCESS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.028
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective. - To assess maternal outcomes during trial of labor (TOL) and elective repeat caesarean delivery (ERCD) in women with a previous caesarean delivery. Methods. - French and English publications were searched using PubMed and Cochrane Library. Results. - Maternal mortality remains a very rare event regardless of the planned mode of delivery (EL2). It is potentially reduced after a TOL but the presence of biases in many studies does not allow any conclusion (EL3). Maternal morbidity is mainly due to the failure of the TOL and to the risk of unplanned caesarean delivery during labor (EL2). The risk of complete uterine rupture significantly increases with TOL versus ERCD but it remains low at about 0.2 to 0.8% for women with one scar on the uterus (EL2). The occurrence of a post-surgical wound, mostly from the bladder, is rare (less than 0.5%) regardless of the planned mode of delivery (EL2). Facing the risk of hemorrhage requiring hysterectomy or blood transfusion, data are heterogeneous because of the nature of the populations studied. These risks do not seem to vary with the mode of delivery (EL3). The risk of post-partum venous thrombo-embolic complications and infections (endometritis and maternal fever) appears to be similar in both TOL and ERCD (EL3). The risk of infection is primarily related to the additional presence of obesity (EL2). While maternal morbidity progressively increases with the number of iterative caesarean sections, maternal morbidity in TOL after a previous caesarean delivery decreases with the number of successful TOL (EL2). Conclusion. - In patients with a previous caesarean delivery, the risks of maternal complications are rare and similar between TOL and ERCD. There is an increased risk of complete uterine rupture in case of TOL. Nevertheless TOL has a favorable benefit/risk balance in most cases and its success reduces the risk of short and long-term maternal complications (EL3). (C) 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:708 / 726
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Trial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean delivery in twin pregnancies after a previous cesarean delivery-A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shinar, Shiri
    Agrawal, Swati
    Hasan, Haroon
    Berger, Howard
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2019, 46 (04): : 550 - 559
  • [22] Morbidity of Repeat Cesarean Delivery after a Trial of Labor as Compared with Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery
    Markovic, Emily S.
    Fox, Nathan S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 41 : e2582 - e2586
  • [23] Is it worth inducing labour in women with a previous caesarean delivery?
    Nooh, A.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 32 (02) : 141 - 144
  • [24] Economic Evaluations Comparing a Trial of Labor with an Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review
    Rogers, Anna Joy
    Rogers, Nathaniel G.
    Kilgore, Meredith L.
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Harper, Lorie M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (01) : 163 - 173
  • [25] Predictors of successful vaginal birth after a caesarean in women with a previous single caesarean delivery
    Sahin, S.
    Ozkaya, E.
    Eroglu, M.
    Sanverdi, I
    Celik, Z.
    Cakiroglu, A.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 26 (05) : 1594 - 1600
  • [26] Perinatal morbidity among women with a previous caesarean delivery (PRISMA trial): a cluster-randomised trial
    Chaillet, Nils
    Masse, Benoit
    Grobman, William A.
    Shorten, Allison
    Gauthier, Robert
    Rozenberg, Patrick
    Dugas, Marylene
    Pasquier, Jean-Charles
    Audibert, Francois
    Abenhaim, Haim A.
    Demers, Suzanne
    Piedboeuf, Bruno
    Fraser, William
    Gagnon, Robert
    Gagne, Guy-Paul
    Francoeur, Diane
    Girard, Isabelle
    Duperron, Louise
    Bedard, Marie-Josee
    Johri, Mira
    Dube, Eric
    Blouin, Simon
    Ducruet, Thierry
    Girard, Mario
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    LANCET, 2024, 403 (10421) : 44 - 54
  • [27] Trial of Labor versus Repeat Cesarean Delivery in Individuals with Morbid Obesity after Previous Cesarean Delivery
    Lee, Misooja
    Almeida, Tawany C.
    Saade, George
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 41 (14) : 1980 - 1989
  • [28] Uterine dehiscence in pregnant with previous caesarean delivery
    Zhu, Zhengfeng
    Li, HeZhou
    Zhang, JunQing
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2021, 53 (01) : 1265 - 1269
  • [29] Neonatal outcomes following a trial of labor after Caesarean delivery: a population-based study
    Litwin, Charles Edward
    Czuzoj-Shulman, Nicholas
    Zakhari, Andrew
    Abenhaim, Haim Arie
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2018, 31 (16) : 2148 - 2154
  • [30] Neonatal outcome after trial of labor or elective cesarean section in relation to the indication for the previous cesarean delivery
    Fagerberg, Marie C.
    Marsal, Karel
    Kallen, Karin
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 92 (10) : 1151 - 1158