The association of delayed advanced airway management and neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan

Introduction: The effectiveness of advanced airway management (AAM) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has been reported differently in each region; however, no study has accounted for the regional differences in the association between the timing of AAM implementation and neurological outcomes.Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the association between the timing of patient or prefecture level AAM and a favorableneurological outcome defined by cerebral performance category 1 or 2 (CPC 1-2).Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the All-Japan Utstein Registry between 2013 and 2017. We included patients aged >= 8 years with OHCA for whom AAM (i.e., supraglottic airway or en-dotracheal intubation) was performed in a prehospital setting (n = 182,913). We divided the patients into shockable (n = 11,740) and non-shockable (n = 171,173) cohorts based on the initial electrocardiogram rhythm. Multilevel logistic regression analysis estimated the association between AAM time (patient contact-to-AAM performance interval) at the patient level (1-min unit increments), prefecture level (> 9.2 min vs. <= 9.2 min) and CPC 1-2.Results: A delay in AAM time was negatively associated with CPC 1-2 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.92, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-0.93, 0.95-0.97, respectively), regardless of initial rhythm. At the prefecture level, a delay in AAM time was negatively associated with CPC 1-2 (AOR, 0.77, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.58-1.04, 0.50-0.94, respec-tively) only in the non-shockable cohort.Conclusion: A delay in AAM performance was negatively associated with CPC 1-2 in both shockable and non -shockable cohorts. Moreover, a delay in AAM performance at the prefecture level was negatively associated with CPC 1-2 in the non-shockable cohort.(c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.