A prototype system dynamic model for assessing the sustainability of construction projects

被引:130
作者
Zhang, Xiaoling [1 ]
Wu, Yuzhe [2 ]
Shen, Liyin [3 ]
Skitmore, Martin [4 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Publ & Social Adm, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Land Management, Hangzhou 310029, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Univ, Fac Construct Management & Real Estate, Chongqing 401331, Peoples R China
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Built Environm, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
关键词
Construction project management; Sustainable development ability (SDA); System dynamics; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.01.009
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
There is a worldwide demand for an increasingly sustainable built environment. This has resulted in the need for a more accurate evaluation of the level of sustainability of construction projects. To do this it involves the development of better measurement and benchmarking methods. One approach is to use a theoretical model to assess construction projects in terms of their sustainable development value (SDV) and sustainable development ability (SDA) for implementation in the project life cycle, where SDA measures the contribution of a project to development sustainability and as a major criterion for assessing its feasibility. This paper develops an improved SDA prototype model that incorporates the effects of dynamical factors on project sustainability. This involves the introduction of two major factors concerning technological advancement and changes in people's perceptions. A case study is used to demonstrate the procedures involved in simulation and modeling, one outcome of which is to demonstrate the greater influence of technological advancement on project sustainability than changes in perception. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 76
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Baloi D., 2003, International Journal of Project Management, V21, P261, DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00017-0
[2]  
Bengtsson M., 2001, J IND ECOL, V4, P47, DOI [10.1162/10881980052541945, DOI 10.1162/10881980052541945]
[3]  
Bröchner J, 1999, BUILD RES INF, V27, P368
[4]  
Brundtland Gro., 1987, Our Common Future: Report of the 1987 World Commission on Environment and Development, V1, P59
[5]  
Chritamara S., 2002, CONSTR INNOV-ENGL, V2, P269, DOI [10.1108/14714170210814801, DOI 10.1108/14714170210814801]
[6]  
CIB, 1999, AG SUST CONSTR, P41
[7]   Building environmental assessment methods: clarifying intentions [J].
Cole, RJ .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 1999, 27 (4-5) :230-246
[8]   Which focus for building assessment methods environmental performance or sustainability? [J].
Cooper, I .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 1999, 27 (4-5) :321-331
[9]   Building environmental assessment methods: applications and development trends [J].
Crawley, D ;
Aho, I .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 1999, 27 (4-5) :300-308
[10]   Sustainable construction - The role of environmental assessment tools [J].
Ding, Grace K. C. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 86 (03) :451-464