Decision fusion and non-parametric classifiers for land use mapping using multi-temporal RapidEye data

被引:65
作者
Loew, Fabian [1 ]
Conrad, Christopher [1 ]
Michel, Ulrich [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Remote Sensing, Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Univ Educ Heidelberg, Dept Geog, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Agricultural land use; Supervised classification; Decision fusion; High-resolution; Multi-temporal; RapidEye; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; RANDOM FOREST CLASSIFIER; PROBA-V MISSION; CROP CLASSIFICATION; COVER CLASSIFICATION; SPATIAL-RESOLUTION; TRAINING DATA; TIME-SERIES; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; NEURAL-NETWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.07.001
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This study addressed the classification of multi-temporal satellite data from RapidEye by considering different classifier algorithms and decision fusion. Four non-parametric classifier algorithms, decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and multilayer perceptron (MLP), were applied to map crop types in various irrigated landscapes in Central Asia. A novel decision fusion strategy to combine the outputs of the classifiers was proposed. This approach is based on randomly selecting subsets of the input dataset and aggregating the probabilistic outputs of the base classifiers with another meta-classifier. During the decision fusion, the reliability of each base classifier algorithm was considered to exclude less reliable inputs at the class-basis. The spatial and temporal transferability of the classifiers was evaluated using data sets from four different agricultural landscapes with different spatial extents and from different years. A detailed accuracy assessment showed that none of the stand-alone classifiers was the single best performing. Despite the very good performance of the base classifiers, there was still up to 50% disagreement in the maps produced by the two single best classifiers, RF and SVM. The proposed fusion strategy, however, increased overall accuracies up to 6%. In addition, it was less sensitive to reduced training set sizes and produced more realistic land use maps with less speckle. The proposed fusion approach was better transferable to data sets from other years, i.e. resulted in higher accuracies for the investigated classes. The fusion approach is computationally efficient and appears well suited for mapping diverse crop categories based on sensors with a similar high repetition rate and spatial resolution like RapidEye, for instance the upcoming Sentinel-2 mission. (C) 2015 International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Inc. (ISPRS). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 204
页数:14
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   Improvements in land use mapping for irrigated agriculture from satellite sensor data using a multi-stage maximum likelihood classification [J].
Abou El-Magd, I ;
Tanton, TW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 24 (21) :4197-4206
[2]   Parcel-Level Identification of Crop Types Using Different Classification Algorithms and Multi-Resolution Imagery in Southeastern Turkey [J].
Alganci, Ugur ;
Sertel, Elif ;
Ozdogan, Mutlu ;
Ormeci, Cankut .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 79 (11) :1053-1065
[3]  
[Anonymous], P SPIE
[4]  
[Anonymous], J STAT SOFTW, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:3(199)
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, GEOCARTO INT, DOI DOI 10.1080/10106049.2013.768300
[6]  
[Anonymous], WORKSH DEV STRAT GLO
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2000, STAT ENG INFORM SCI
[8]   Advances in Remote Sensing of Agriculture: Context Description, Existing Operational Monitoring Systems and Major Information Needs [J].
Atzberger, Clement .
REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 5 (02) :949-981
[9]   Definition of a comprehensive set of texture semivariogram features and their evaluation for object-oriented image classification [J].
Balaguer, A. ;
Ruiz, L. A. ;
Hermosilla, T. ;
Recio, J. A. .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2010, 36 (02) :231-240
[10]   Multisource remote sensing data classification based on consensus and pruning [J].
Benediktsson, JA ;
Sveinsson, JR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 41 (04) :932-936