Feasibility of Very Early Identification of Cardiogenic Shock by Semi-automated Ultrasound Exam in the Emergency Department

被引:4
作者
Morales, Gabriel [1 ]
Adedipe, Adeyinka [1 ]
Morse, Sophie [1 ]
McCabe, James [2 ]
Mahr, Claudius [2 ]
Nichol, Graham [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Emergency Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
echocardiogram; resuscitation; shock; lung ultrasound (lus); velocity time integral; point-of-care-ultrasound; cardiogenic shock; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; EJECTION FRACTION; OUTCOMES; MANAGEMENT; REVASCULARIZATION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; RECOMMENDATIONS; RESPONSIVENESS; ASSOCIATION; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.30927
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Cardiogenic shock (CS) is critical end-organ hypoperfusion due to reduced cardiac output. Early therapy, such as vasoactive agents or the initiation of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), requires early diagnosis and is associated with better outcomes. A novel ultrasound platform (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) has semi- automated imaging software (SAIS), which could simplify the point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) diagnosis of CS. We assessed the feasibility of using POCUS with SAIS in patients in shock, determined the ability of SAIS to identify the subset of patients with CS, and described the process and outcome of care of patients with vs. without CS after presenting to Emergency Department (ED) with hypotension. Methods This prospective case-control study was conducted at an urban ED. Physicians with prior POCUS education received one hour of training with the study device. The qualitative ejection fraction was determined by visual assessment. SAIS measurements of hemodynamics were made with the study device and included left ventricle outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT VTI), inferior vena cava collapsibility or distensibility indices, and pulmonary B- line assessment. ED patients with a systolic blood pressure = 90 mmHg or need for a vasopressor initiation in the ED were enrolled. The diagnosis of CS was determined by a medical record review. All data were summarized descriptively. Results Twenty-nine cases underwent POCUS, and 87 controls did not. Baseline characteristics, process, and outcome of care were similar between groups. Seventy-nine percent ( 79%) of cases had a complete POCUS with SAIS. Of these, 55% had reduced LVOT VTI, 38% had IVC collapsibility <50%, and 48% of cases had a B-line pattern consistent with pulmonary edema. The mean LVOT VTI for cases with CS was 9.4 +/- 5.4 cm; the mean LVOT VTI for cases without CS was 15.2 +/- 6.0 cm. Among patients who did not undergo POCUS, 31 (36%) had a formal echocardiogram, and eight (9%) had a final diagnosis of cardiogenic shock during hospitalization. Conclusion Physicians with one hour of platform-specific training were able to implement POCUS with SAIS among patients who present with shock. POCUS with SAIS may aid in the early recognition of CS.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] Lancellotti P, 2015, EUR HEART J-ACUTE CA, V4, P3, DOI 10.1177/2048872614568073
  • [22] Diagnosis of central hypovolemia by using passive leg raising
    Maizel, Julien
    Airapetian, Norair
    Lorne, Emmanuel
    Tribouilloy, Christophe
    Massy, Ziad
    Slama, Michel
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 33 (07) : 1133 - 1138
  • [23] Emergency department non-invasive cardiac output study (EDNICO): a feasibility and repeatability study
    McGregor, D.
    Sharma, S.
    Gupta, S.
    Ahmad, S.
    Godec, T.
    Harris, Tim
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 27 (1)
  • [24] Echocardiography in shock management
    McLean, Anthony S.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 20
  • [25] Moore CL, 2002, ACAD EMERG MED, V9, P186, DOI 10.1197/aemj.9.3.186
  • [26] Risk factors of late cardiogenic shock and mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients
    Obling, Laust
    Frydland, Martin
    Hansen, Rikke
    Moller-Helgestad, Ole Kristian
    Lindholm, Matias Greve
    Holmvang, Lene
    Ravn, Hanne Berg
    Wiberg, Sebastian
    Thomsen, Jakob Hartvig
    Jensen, Lisette Okkels
    Kjaergaard, Jesper
    Moller, Jacob Eifer
    Hassager, Christian
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2018, 7 (01) : 7 - 15
  • [27] Echocardiographic predictors of survival and response to early revascularization in cardiogenic shock
    Picard, MH
    Davidoff, R
    Sleeper, LA
    Mendes, LA
    Thompson, CR
    Dzavik, V
    Steingart, R
    Gin, K
    White, HD
    Hochman, JS
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2003, 107 (02) : 279 - 284
  • [28] Cardiogenic shock in intensive care units: evolution of prevalence, patient profile, management and outcomes, 1997-2012
    Puymirat, Etienne
    Fagon, Jean Yves
    Aegerter, Philippe
    Diehl, Jean Luc
    Monnier, Alexandra
    Hauw-Berlemont, Caroline
    Boissier, Florence
    Chatellier, Gilles
    Guidet, Bertrand
    Danchin, Nicolas
    Aissaoui, Nadia
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2017, 19 (02) : 192 - 200
  • [29] Accuracy of emergency physician assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and central venous pressure using echocardiography
    Randazzo, MR
    Snoey, ER
    Levitt, MA
    Binder, K
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 10 (09) : 973 - 977
  • [30] Contemporary trends in cardiogenic shock: Incidence, intra-aortic balloon pump utilisation and outcomes from the London Heart Attack Group
    Rathod, Krishnaraj S.
    Koganti, Sudheer
    Iqbal, M. Bilal
    Jain, Ajay K.
    Kalra, Sundeep S.
    Astroulakis, Zoe
    Lim, Pitt
    Rakhit, Roby
    Dalby, Miles C.
    Lockie, Tim
    Malik, Iqbal S.
    Knight, Charles J.
    Whitbread, Mark
    Mathur, Anthony
    Redwood, Simon
    MacCarthy, Philip A.
    Sirker, Alexander
    O'Mahony, Constantinos
    Wragg, Andrew
    Jones, Daniel A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2018, 7 (01) : 16 - 27