Application of Opposition-based Differential Evolution Algorithm to Generation Expansion Planning Problem

被引:10
作者
Karthikeyan, K. [1 ]
Kannan, S. [1 ]
Baskar, S. [2 ]
Thangaraj, C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Kalasalingam Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Krishnankoil, India
[2] Thiagarajar Coll Engn, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Anna Univ Technol, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Dynamic programming; Differential evolution; Generation expansion planning; Opposition-based differential evolution; Virtual mapping procedure; GENETIC ALGORITHM; METAHEURISTIC TECHNIQUES; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.5370/JEET.2013.8.4.686
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Generation Expansion Planning (GEP) is one of the most important decision-making activities in electric utilities. Least-cost GEP is to determine the minimum-cost capacity addition plan (i.e., the type and number of candidate plants) that meets forecasted demand within a pre specified reliability criterion over a planning horizon. In this paper, Differential Evolution (DE), and Opposition-based Differential Evolution (ODE) algorithms have been applied to the GEP problem. The original GEP problem has been modified by incorporating Virtual Mapping Procedure (VMP). The GEP problem of a synthetic test systems for 6-year, 14-year and 24-year planning horizons having five types of candidate units have been considered. The results have been compared with Dynamic Programming (DP) method. The ODE performs well and converges faster than DE.
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 693
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] LONG-RANGE GENERATION PLANNING USING DECOMPOSITION AND PROBABILISTIC SIMULATION
    BLOOM, JA
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1982, 101 (04): : 797 - 802
  • [2] Generation Expansion Planning in the Age of Green Economy
    Careri, Francesco
    Genesi, Camillo
    Marannino, Paolo
    Montagna, Mario
    Rossi, Stefano
    Siviero, Ilaria
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2011, 26 (04) : 2214 - 2223
  • [3] Generation expansion planning of the utility with refined immune algorithm
    Chen, SL
    Zhan, TS
    Tsay, MT
    [J]. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2006, 76 (04) : 251 - 258
  • [4] Guest Editorial: Special Issue on Differential Evolution
    Das, Swagatam
    Suganthan, P. N.
    Coello Coello, Carlos Artemio
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2011, 15 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [5] Generation expansion planning: An iterative genetic algorithm approach
    Firmo, HT
    Legey, LFL
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2002, 17 (03) : 901 - 906
  • [6] Cap-and-trade vs. carbon taxes: A quantitative comparison from a generation expansion planning perspective
    He, Yanyi
    Wang, Lizhi
    Wang, Jianhui
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 63 (03) : 708 - 716
  • [7] *INT AT EN AG, 2001, INTR WASP 4 MOD US M
  • [8] Power generation planning: a survey from monopoly to competition
    Kagiannas, AG
    Askounis, DT
    Psarras, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2004, 26 (06) : 413 - 421
  • [9] Generation expansion planning in wind-thermal power systems
    Kamalinia, S.
    Shahidehpour, M.
    [J]. IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2010, 4 (08) : 940 - 951
  • [10] Application and comparison of metaheuristic techniques to generation expansion planning in the partially deregulated environment
    Kannan, S.
    Slochanal, S. Mary Raja
    Baskar, S.
    Murugan, P.
    [J]. IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2007, 1 (01) : 111 - 118