Assessment of pelvic floor of women runners by three-dimensional ultrasonography and surface electromyography. A pilot study.

被引:3
作者
Araujo Junior, Edward [1 ]
Katalin Jarmy-Di Bella, Zsuzsanna Ilona [2 ]
Diniz Zanetti, Miriam Raquel [1 ]
Araujo, Maita Poli [2 ]
Petricelli, Carla Dellabarba [1 ]
Martins, Wellington P. [1 ,3 ]
Alexandre, Sandra Maria [1 ]
Nakamura, Mary Uchiyama [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Obstet, BR-05303000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Fed Univ Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Gynecol, BR-05303000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, FMRP, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
关键词
pelvic floor; women runners; three-dimensional ultrasound; surface electromyography; LEVATOR ANI MUSCLE; URINARY-INCONTINENCE; ULTRASOUND; ANATOMY; REPEATABILITY; RELIABILITY; PALPATION; PROLAPSE; STRESS;
D O I
10.11152/mu.2014.2066.161.eaj1zik2
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Aim: To evaluate female runners' pelvic floor muscles using three-dimensional ultrasonography (3DUS) and surface electromyography (SEMG). Material and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 24 female runners. SEMG was performed using surface electrodes inserted in the vagina. 3DUS was performed using perineal convex transducer. SEMG was evaluated at rest and with maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) and slow contraction. Levator ani muscle thickness, levator hiatus area and the angle between the levator muscles at rest and with MVC and Valsalva were evaluated using 3DUS. The women were divided into two groups (women running <= 25 km/week; women running > 25 km/week). Means, standard deviations and non-paired t tests were used for both groups. Results: Among the 24 women, 11 ran <= 25 km/week (16.91 +/- 4.13 km/week) and 13 ran > 25 km/week (40.77 +/- 1.15 km/week). The mean SEMG at rest and with MVC and slow contraction were 16.25, 65.86 and 71.41 mV, respectively. For the levator hiatus area at rest and with MVC and Valsalva, the means were 12.54, 10.06 and 16.57 cm2, respectively. Correlations between 3DUS and SEMG showed significant differences in SEMG at rest and levator thickness with Valsalva (r = 0.46; p = 0.04). Conclusions: 3DUS and SEMG are two feasible methods for evaluating female runners' pelvic floor. Correlations between 3DUS and SEMG showed significant differences in SEMG at rest and levator thickness with Valsalva.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 26
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] andre SM, 2011, INT UROGYNECOL J, V22, P677
  • [2] Araujo Junior E, 2013, REV BRAS GINECOL OBS, V35, P117
  • [3] Functional anatomy of the female pelvic floor
    Ashton-Miller, James A.
    Delancey, John O. L.
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMECHANICS, 2007, 1101 : 266 - 296
  • [4] Bo K, 2001, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V33, P1797
  • [5] Is there correlation between electromyography and digital palpation as means of measuring pelvic floor muscle contractility in nulliparous, pregnant, and postpartum women?
    Botelho, Simone
    Pereira, Larissa Carvalho
    Marques, Joseane
    Lanza, Ana Helena
    Amorim, Cesar Ferreira
    Palma, Paulo
    Riccetto, Cassio
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2013, 32 (05) : 420 - 423
  • [6] Test-retest and intra-observer repeatability of two-, three- and four-dimensional perineal ultrasound of pelvic floor muscle anatomy and function
    Braekken, Ingeborg Hoff
    Majida, Memona
    Ellstrom-Engh, Marie
    Dietz, Hans Peter
    Umek, Wolfgang
    Bo, Kari
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2008, 19 (02) : 227 - 235
  • [7] DeLancey JOL, 2003, OBSTET GYNECOL, V101, P46, DOI 10.1097/00006250-200301000-00012
  • [8] The assessment of levator trauma: A comparison between palpation and 4D pelvic floor ultrasound
    Dietz, H. P.
    Hyland, G.
    Hay-Smith, J.
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2006, 25 (05) : 424 - 427
  • [9] Does delayed child-bearing increase the risk of levator injury in labour?
    Dietz, Hans P.
    Simpson, Judy M.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 47 (06) : 491 - 495
  • [10] The evolution of ultrasound in urogynecology
    Dietz, Hans Peter
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 36 (06) : 655 - 657