A mathematical approach to assess research diversity: operationalization and applicability in communication sciences, political science, and beyond

被引:8
作者
Goyanes, Manuel [1 ,2 ]
Demeter, Marton [3 ]
Grane, Aurea [4 ]
Albarran-Lozano, Irene [4 ]
Gil de Zuniga, Homero [2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Carlos III Univ, Dept Commun, C Madrid 133, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Salamanca, Democracy Res Unit DRU, Polit Sci, Salamanca, Spain
[3] Natl Univ Publ Serv, Dept Social Commun, Budapest, Hungary
[4] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Dept Stat, Madrid, Spain
[5] Penn State Univ, Dept Film Prod & Media Studies, State Coll, PA USA
[6] Univ Diego Portales, Fac Comunicac & Letras, Santiago, Chile
关键词
Research diversity; Diversity; Communication science; Political science; Diversity gaps; SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION; CITATION PATTERNS; EDITORIAL-BOARDS; JOURNALS; EDITORS; INTERDISCIPLINARITY; MEDIA; FIELD; BIBLIOMETRICS; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-020-03680-6
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
With today's research production and global dissemination, there is growing pressure to assess how academic fields foster diversity. Based on a mathematical problem/solve scheme, the aim of this study is twofold. First, the paper elaborates on how research diversity in scientific fields can be empirically gauged, proposing six working definitions. Second, drawing on these theoretical explanations, we introduce an original methodological protocol for research diversity evaluation. Third, the study puts this mathematical model to an empirical test by comparatively evaluating (1) communication research diversity in 2017, with respect to field's diversity in 1997, and (2) communication research and political science diversity in 2017. Our results indicate that, contrasted to pattern diversity, communication research in 2017 is not a diverse field. However, throughout the years (1997-2017), there is a statistically significant improvement. Finally, the cross-comparison examination between political and communication sciences reveals the latter to be significantly more diverse.
引用
收藏
页码:2299 / 2322
页数:24
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Agresti A, 1978, SOCIOL METHODOL, P204, DOI DOI 10.2307/270810
[2]  
Bhattacharyya A, 1943, B CALCUTTA MATH SOC, V35, P99, DOI DOI 10.1038/157869B0
[3]  
Bone F., 2019, SCI POLICY RES UNIT, V2019-09
[4]   BIBLIOMETRICS AND SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION - EDITORS INTRODUCTION [J].
BORGMAN, CL .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1989, 16 (05) :583-599
[5]   Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment [J].
Boschma, RA .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2005, 39 (01) :61-74
[6]   Publish or perish: A limited author analysis of ICA and NCA journals [J].
Bunz, U .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2005, 55 (04) :703-720
[7]   #Communication So White [J].
Chakravartty, Paula ;
Kuo, Rachel ;
Grubbs, Victoria ;
McIlwain, Charlton .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2018, 68 (02) :254-266
[8]  
Curran J., 2000, De-westernizing media studies
[9]  
Demeter M, 2018, INT J COMMUNICATION, V12, P29
[10]   Editorial boards of accounting journals: gender diversity and internationalisation [J].
Dhanani, Alpa ;
Jones, Michael John .
ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2017, 30 (05) :1008-1040