Ownership Structure and Carbon Emissions of SMEs: Evidence from OECD Countries

被引:6
作者
Ghachem, Dorsaf Azouz [1 ]
Basty, Nadia [1 ]
Zureigat, Qasim [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tunis, Higher Inst Management Tunis, LR GEF 2A, Tunis 2000, Tunisia
[2] Sulaiman AlRajhi Univ, Sch Business, Al Bukayriyah 52726, Saudi Arabia
关键词
stakeholder theory; legitimacy; signal theory; climate change; ecological transition; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP; CO2; EMISSIONS; AGENCY COSTS; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; INNOVATION; FIRM; IMPACT; DISCLOSURE;
D O I
10.3390/su142114408
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This work investigates the impact that the ownership structure of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries exerts on the level of corporate carbon emissions, as well as the moderating effect of innovation on this relationship. Based on panel data from 32 OECD countries during 2015-2020, a pooled least-square panel model was developed for estimation. The results show that public, foreign, and institutional investors have a significant negative effect on carbon emissions. Conversely, strategic investors contribute to increasing carbon emissions. Moreover, findings provide evidence of mixed moderating effects of innovation on the relationship between types of owners and carbon emissions. Hence, strategic shareholders contribute to implementing environmental policies through innovation, while public and foreign investors incur Research and Development expenditures to boost firms' economic activity, ignoring social and environmental commitments. Our results confirm the relationship between ownership structure and carbon emissions and the moderating effects of innovation on this association. Environmental innovation allows for improving worldwide firms' competitiveness and long-term performance.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Board composition, ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: the case of Jordan [J].
Abu Qa'dan, Mohammad Bassam ;
Suwaidan, Mishiel Said .
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL, 2019, 15 (01) :28-46
[2]   Corporate governance and social responsibility: a comparative analysis of the UK and the US [J].
Aguilera, RV ;
Williams, CA ;
Conley, JM ;
Rupp, DE .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2006, 14 (03) :147-158
[3]   Sustainable product innovation in agri-food industry: Do ownership structure and capital structure matter? [J].
Aibar-Guzman, Beatriz ;
Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria ;
Aibar-Guzman, Cristina ;
Hussain, Nazim .
JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE, 2022, 7 (01)
[4]   The impact of board independence and foreign ownership on financial and social performance of firms: evidence from the UAE [J].
Al-Gamrh, Bakr ;
Al-Dhamari, Redhwan ;
Jalan, Akanksha ;
Jahanshahi, Asghar .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2020, 21 (02) :201-229
[5]   The impact of government and foreign affiliate influence on corporate social reporting The case of Malaysia [J].
Amran, Azlan ;
Devi, S. Susela .
MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2008, 23 (04) :386-+
[6]   Are capitalists green? Firm ownership and provincial CO2 emissions in China [J].
Andersson, Fredrik N. G. ;
Opper, Sonja ;
Khalid, Usman .
ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 123 :349-359
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, AL POL LOW CARB EC
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Social Impact Investment 2019: The Impact Imperative for Sustainable Development, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264311299-EN
[9]   Impact of urbanization, economic growth, and population size on residential carbon emissions in the SAARC countries [J].
Anser, Muhammad Khalid ;
Alharthi, Majed ;
Aziz, Babar ;
Wasim, Sarah .
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2020, 22 (04) :923-936
[10]   Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders [J].
Barnea, Amir ;
Rubin, Amir .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 97 (01) :71-86