Workplace Bullying and Work Engagement: A Self-Determination Model

被引：26

作者：

Goodboy, Alan K. ^{[1
]}

Martin, Matthew M. ^{[1
]}

Bolkan, San ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] West Virginia Univ, Dept Commun Studies, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA

[2] Calif State Univ Long Beach, Dept Commun Studies, Long Beach, CA 90840 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE | 2020年 / 35卷 / 21-22期

关键词：

workplace bullying; self-determination; intrinsic motivation to work; worker engagement; BASIC NEED SATISFACTION; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; MEDIATING ROLE; COMMUNICATION; BURNOUT; QUESTIONNAIRE; COMPETENCE; EXPOSURE; AUTONOMY; IMPACT;

D O I：

10.1177/0886260517717492

中图分类号：

DF [法律]; D9 [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

This study modeled motivational mechanisms that explain the negative effects of workplace bullying on work engagement. Guided by self-determination theory, workplace bullying was predicted to decrease worker engagement indirectly, due to the denial of employees' basic psychological needs and their intrinsic motivation to work. From a sample of 243 full-time employees, serial multiple mediation models revealed that the indirect relationships between workplace bullying and work engagement (i.e., vigor, dedication, absorption) were serially mediated by basic psychological needs and intrinsic motivation to work. In support of self-determination theory, this study revealed that workplace bullying indirectly disengages employees from their work by denying them of their autonomy and relatedness needs and thwarting their motivation to perform work in a fulfilling way.

引用

页码：4686 / 4708

页数：23

共 50 条

[31] Bullying, disability and work: a case study of workplace bullying
Vickers, Margaret H.
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONS AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 4 (03): : 255 - 272
[32] Facilitating health care workers' self-determination: The impact of a self-leadership intervention on work engagement, health, and performance
van Dorssen-Boog, Pauline
van Vuuren, Tinka
de Jong, Jeroen P.
Veld, Monique
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 94 (02) : 259 - 281
[33] SELF-DETERMINATION: MODEL AND METHOD OF ORGANIZATION
Popov, Alexander A.
Averkov, Mikhail S.
Matyunina, Marina A.
VESTNIK TOMSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA-FILOSOFIYA-SOTSIOLOGIYA-POLITOLOGIYA-TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY SOCIOLOGY AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 65 : 154 - 170
[34] The interplay of perceived stress, self-determination and school engagement in adolescence
Raufelder, Diana
Kittler, Frieder
Braun, Sarah R.
Laetsch, Alexander
Wilkinson, R. Poppy
Hoferichter, Frances
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 35 (04) : 405 - 420
[35] Peer Support, Self-Determination, and Treatment Engagement: A Qualitative Investigation
Jones, Nev
Corrigan, Patrick W.
James, Drexler
Larson, Nanette
PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION JOURNAL, 2013, 36 (03) : 209 - 214
[36] Student Engagement in Virtual Learning: The Self-Determination Theory Perspective
Farikah
Mulyani, Mimi
Astuty
Mazid, Sukron
ARAB WORLD ENGLISH JOURNAL, 2023, 14 (03) : 182 - 198
[37] Motivation, self-determination, and reflexivity of researchers in comedic public engagement
Gallagher, Aine
Fracchiolla, Claudia
Fairfield, Jessamyn A.
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2024,
[38] SAFE WORK AUSTRALIA: WORKPLACE BULLYING
Williamson, M.
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 49 : 6 - 7
[39] SELF-DETERMINATION IN SOCIAL-WORK - MCDERMOTT,FE
CARMICHAEL, K
PHILOSOPHICAL JOURNAL, 1975, 12 (02): : 100 - 101
[40] Self-Determination Theory in Work Organizations: The State of a Science
Deci, Edward L.
Olafsen, Anja H.
Ryan, Richard M.
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 4, 2017, 4 : 19 - 43

← 1 2 3 4 5 →