The Intersection of Power, Trust and Supplier Network Size: Implications for Supplier Performance

被引:91
作者
Terpend, Regis [1 ]
Ashenbaum, Bryan [2 ]
机构
[1] Boise State Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Boise, ID 83725 USA
[2] Miami Univ, Farmer Sch Business, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
关键词
buyer-supplier relationships; supplier performance; power; trust; single sourcing; multiple sourcing; supplier network; social network theory; TRANSACTION COSTS; UNITED-STATES; SINGLE; STRATEGIES; KNOWLEDGE; PARADIGM; IMPACT; FUTURE; MARKET;
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-493X.2011.03261.x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper examines the intersecting effects of power, trust and supplier network size on five dimensions of supplier performance (delivery, quality, cost, innovation and flexibility). When assessing main effects, coercive power shows a negative relationship with supplier quality and innovation, referent power shows a positive relationship with all dimensions of supplier performance and legitimate power shows a positive relationship with supplier delivery, cost and flexibility. The supplier's trust in the buyer also shows a positive relationship to all five supplier performance dimensions. While exhibiting no main effects, supplier network size moderates these powerperformance relationships. Increasing supplier network size appears to attenuate the impacts of coercive and referent power upon supplier performance, while strengthening this connection in the case of legitimate power. Contrary to our hypotheses, expert power use exhibits a negative relationship with supplier delivery performance, an effect which is exacerbated with increasing supplier network size. Overall, this study suggests that while not as independently important as perhaps thought, selecting the right number of suppliers may have considerable contextual influence on the interplay between power, trust and performance in buyersupplier relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 77
页数:26
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism [J].
Adler, PS .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2001, 12 (02) :215-234
[2]  
AITKEN JE, 1988, ANN M CAN COMM ASS W
[4]   Trust, power and control in trans-organizational relations [J].
Bachmann, R .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2001, 22 (02) :337-365
[5]   The influence of power driven buyer/seller relationships on supply chain satisfaction [J].
Benton, WC ;
Maloni, M .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2005, 23 (01) :1-22
[6]   ON SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS IN A SUPPLY CHAIN CONTEXT [J].
Borgatti, Stephen P. ;
Li, Xun .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2009, 45 (02) :5-22
[7]   PRICE, AUTHORITY, AND TRUST - FROM IDEAL TYPES TO PLURAL FORMS [J].
BRADACH, JL ;
ECCLES, RG .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1989, 15 :97-118
[8]   Power and relationship commitment: Their impact on marketing channel member performance [J].
Brown, JR ;
Lusch, RF ;
Nicholson, CY .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 1995, 71 (04) :363-392
[9]  
Brown M., 2004, Illuminating Patterns of Perception: An Overview of Q Methodology
[10]   EXPERIMENTAL-ANALYSIS OF A SALESMANS EXPERT AND REFERENT BASES OF SOCIAL POWER IN BUYER-SELLER DYAD [J].
BUSCH, P ;
WILSON, DT .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1976, 13 (01) :3-11