Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12-14years

被引:202
作者
Jung, Ronald E. [1 ]
Fenner, Nadine [1 ]
Haemmerle, Christoph H. F. [1 ]
Zitzmann, Nicola U. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Dept Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat Sci, CH-8028 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel, Clin Periodontol Endodontol & Cariol, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
bone regeneration; bone substitute; bone transplantation; dental implant; graft material; human; membranes; BARRIER MEMBRANES; AUGMENTATION; SURVIVAL; DEFECTS; RIDGE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02522.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of implants placed simultaneously with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes. Materials and methods The original study population consisted of 72 patients receiving a total of 265 implants. In all GBR-treated sites, demineralized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) was used in combination either with a collagen (CM) or an Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) membrane. A total of 112 implants was treated with CM, 41 implants were treated with e-PTFE membranes, and 112 served as a control group because implants were entirely surrounded by bone and did not need any GBR procedures. Clinical and radiographic analyses were performed after a period of 12-14years. Results The median follow-up time was 12.5years (range 12-14years). A total of 58 patients participated in the present investigation, corresponding to 80.5% of the original study population. The cumulative implant survival rate at the follow-up examination was 93.2%. For the control group the cumulative survival rate was 94.6%, for the CM 91.9%, and for the e-PTFE 92.6%. Differences among the groups were not statistically significant. The radiographically determined marginal bone level (MBL) amounted to: control 2.36mm (SD), CM 2.4mm (SD), e-PTFE 2.53mm (SD). There is no evidence (P<0.2) that the slope of bone level over time is different for the three treatment groups. Conclusion It is concluded that implants placed simultaneously with GBR procedures using resorbable or non-resorbable membranes reveal a high survival rate ranging from 91.9% to 92.6%, therefore it is considered to be a safe and predictable therapy. [Correction added after online publication 30 November 2012: the marginal bone level of CM, e-PTFE, and control was corrected to control 2.36mm (SD), CM 2.4mm (SD), e-PTFE 2.53mm (SD)' in the Results section]
引用
收藏
页码:1065 / 1073
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
AINAMO J, 1975, INT DENT J, V25, P229
[2]  
Bates D., 2009, Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
[3]  
Becker W, 1999, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V1, P27, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00088.x
[4]   Clinical and radiographic comparison of implants in regenerated or native bone: 5-year results [J].
Benic, Goran I. ;
Jung, Ronald E. ;
Siegenthaler, David W. ;
Haemmerle, Christoph H. F. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (05) :507-513
[5]   Long-Term Follow-Up of CeraOne™ Single-Implant Restorations: An 18-Year Follow-Up Study Based on a Prospective Patient Cohort [J].
Bergenblock, Sibel ;
Andersson, Bernt ;
Furst, Bjorn ;
Jemt, Torsten .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (04) :471-479
[6]   Long-term results and survival rate of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year case series prospective study [J].
Blanco, J ;
Alonso, A ;
Sanz, M .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2005, 16 (03) :294-301
[7]   Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in bone regenerated with the membrane technique - 5-year results of a prospective study with 12 implants [J].
Buser, D ;
Dula, K ;
Lang, NP ;
Nyman, S .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1996, 7 (02) :175-183
[8]  
Chiapasco M, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P906
[9]  
Dahlin C, 1991, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, V11, P273
[10]  
Dahlin C, 1989, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V4, P19