Preoperative endoscopic predictors of severe submucosal fibrosis in colorectal tumors undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection

被引:27
|
作者
Kaosombatwattana, Uayporn [1 ]
Yamamura, Takeshi [2 ]
Limsrivilai, Julajak [1 ]
Nakamura, Masanao [3 ]
Leelakusolvong, Somchai [1 ]
Hirooka, Yoshiki [2 ]
Goto, Hidemi [3 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Med,Div Gastroenterol, 2 Wanglang Rd, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
[2] Nagoya Univ Hosp, Dept Endoscopy, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[3] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
关键词
CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; TECHNICAL DIFFICULTY; INCOMPLETE RESECTION; RISK-FACTORS; PERFORATION; CANCER; GUIDELINES; NEOPLASIA; BIOPSY; COLON;
D O I
10.1055/a-0848-8225
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc removal of colorectal neoplasms regardless of size. Submucosal fibrosis is a significant factor for technical difficulty and poor outcomes. We assessed the predictive factors for severe submucosal fibrosis and the ESD outcomes. Patients and methods Patients undergoing ESD from January 2006 to September 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The degree of submucosal fibrosis was classified into three types: no fibrosis (F0), mild fibrosis (F1), and severe fibrosis (F2). F0 and F1 cases were grouped as non-severe fibrosis for comparison with the severe fibrosis group. Predictors of severe submucosal fibrosis and ESD outcomes were evaluated. Results ESD was performed in 524 lesions (60% male: mean age, 67.8 years). Eighty lesions with severe fibrosis (15.3%) were observed. The overall en bloc resection rate and curative resection rate were 94.3 % and 77.7%, respectively. Rates of en bloc resection (91.2% vs. 94.8%, P=0.2) and perforation (7.5% vs. 5.6%, P=0.45) were no different between severe fibrosis and non-severe fibrosis groups. However, incidences of non-curative resection and low resection speed were significantly higher in the severe fibrosis group. Among protruding lesions, tumor height and volume were significantly greater in the severe counterparts. A diameter >= 40 mm, endoscopic finding of the tumor beyond fold, and fold convergence were independent risk factors for severe fibrosis. Conclusions Severe submucosal fibrosis is a significant risk factor for non-curative resection and a long procedural time. Tumor size and morphology might help to predict the severity of fibrosis.
引用
收藏
页码:E421 / E430
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection
    Tanaka, Shinji
    Kashida, Hiroshi
    Saito, Yutaka
    Yahagi, Naohisa
    Yamano, Hiroo
    Saito, Shoichi
    Hisabe, Takashi
    Yao, Takashi
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    Yoshida, Masahiro
    Kudo, Shin-ei
    Tsuruta, Osamu
    Sugihara, Ken-ichi
    Watanabe, Toshiaki
    Saitoh, Yusuke
    Igarashi, Masahiro
    Toyonaga, Takashi
    Ajioka, Yoichi
    Ichinose, Masao
    Matsui, Toshiyuki
    Sugita, Akira
    Sugano, Kentaro
    Fujimoto, Kazuma
    Tajiri, Hisao
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 27 (04) : 417 - 434
  • [42] The utility of a novel colonoscope with retroflexion for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Tanaka, Hidenori
    Oka, Shiro
    Tanaka, Shinji
    Inagaki, Katsuaki
    Okamoto, Yuki
    Matsumoto, Kenta
    Boda, Kazuki
    Yamashita, Ken
    Sumimoto, Kyoku
    Ninomiya, Yuki
    Hayashi, Nana
    Chayama, Kazuaki
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2019, 7 (02) : E130 - E137
  • [43] Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: outcome determining factors
    Chow, Chi Woo Samuel
    Fung, Tak Lit Derek
    Chan, Pak Tat
    Kwok, Kam Hung
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (02): : 1293 - 1302
  • [44] Delayed Bleeding After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: When Is Emergency Colonoscopy Needed?
    Chiba, Hideyuki
    Ohata, Ken
    Tachikawa, Jun
    Arimoto, Jun
    Ashikari, Keiichi
    Kuwabara, Hiroki
    Nakaoka, Michiko
    Goto, Toru
    Nakajima, Atsushi
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2019, 64 (03) : 880 - 887
  • [45] Risk factors for perforation during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Yang, Chih-Wei
    Hung, Hsuan-Jen
    Chen, Peng-Jen
    ADVANCES IN DIGESTIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 10 (04) : 206 - 214
  • [46] Risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors
    Li, Ran
    Cai, Shilun
    Sun, Di
    Shi, Qiang
    Ren, Zhong
    Qi, Zhipeng
    Li, Bing
    Yao, Liqing
    Xu, Meidong
    Zhou, Pinghong
    Zhong, Yunshi
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (12): : 6583 - 6590
  • [47] Safe procedure in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors focused on preventing complications
    Yoshida, Naohisa
    Yagi, Nobuaki
    Naito, Yuji
    Yoshikawa, Toshikazu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 16 (14) : 1688 - 1695
  • [48] Safety of simultaneous endoscopic submucosal dissection for two large colorectal neoplasias in the same patient
    Kwak, Min Seob
    Yang, Dong-Hoon
    Hwang, Sung Wook
    Bae, Jung Ho
    Soh, Jae Seung
    Lee, Seohyun
    Lee, Ho-Su
    Lee, Hyo Jeong
    Park, Sang Hyoung
    Ye, Byong Duk
    Byeon, Jeong-Sik
    Myung, Seung-Jae
    Yang, Suk-Kyun
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 29 (02) : 183 - 190
  • [49] Conventional versus hybrid knife endoscopic submucosal dissection in large colorectal laterally spreading tumors: A propensity score analysis
    Yang, Bin
    Shen, Jianhong
    Zhong, Wuxue
    Han, Huazhong
    Lu, Pinxiang
    Jiang, Fei
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 29 (02) : 111 - 118
  • [50] Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for cecal lesions
    Suzuki, Takuto
    Hara, Taro
    Kitagawa, Yoshiyasu
    Takashiro, Hideyuki
    Nankinzan, Rino
    Yamaguchi, Taketo
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 53 (03) : 359 - 364