Tantalum cones for major osteolysis in revision knee replacement

被引:54
作者
Rao, B. M. [1 ]
Kamal, T. T. [1 ]
Vafaye, J. [1 ]
Moss, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Sussex Hosp NHS Trust, St Richards Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Chichester PO19 6SE, W Sussex, England
关键词
TIBIAL BONE LOSS; POROUS TANTALUM; STRUCTURAL ALLOGRAFT; UNCONTAINED DEFECTS; MODULAR COMPONENTS; METAPHYSEAL CONES; ARTHROPLASTY; DEFICIENCY; AUGMENTS; STEMS;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.95B8.29194
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
We report the results of revision total knee replacement (TKR) in 26 patients with major metaphyseal osteolytic defects using 29 trabecular metal cones in conjunction with a rotating hinged total knee prosthesis. The osteolytic defects were types II and III (A or B) according to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) classification. The mean age of the patients was 72 years (62 to 84) and there were 15 men and 11 women. In this series patients had undergone a mean of 2.34 previous total knee arthroplasties. The main objective was to restore anatomy along with stability and function of the knee joint to allow immediate full weight-bearing and active knee movement. Outcomes were measured using Knee Society scores, Oxford knee scores, range of movement of the knee and serial radiographs. Patients were followed for a mean of 36 months (24 to 49). The mean Oxford knee clinical scores improved from 12.83 (10 to 15) to 35.20 (32 to 38) (p < 0.001) and mean American Knee Society scores improved from 33.24 (13 to 36) to 81.12 (78 to 86) (p < 0.001). No radiolucent lines suggestive of loosening were seen around the trabecular metal cones, and by one year all the radiographs showed good osteo-integration. There was no evidence of any collapse or implant migration. Our early results confirm the findings of others that trabecular metal cones offer a useful way of managing severe bone loss in revision TKR.
引用
收藏
页码:1069 / 1074
页数:6
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Management of bone loss - Structural grafts in revision total knee arthroplasty
    Backstein, David
    Safir, Oleg
    Gross, Allan
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (446) : 104 - 112
  • [2] Limitations of Structural Allograft in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Bauman, Ryan D.
    Lewallen, David G.
    Hanssen, Arlen D.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (03) : 818 - 824
  • [3] Distal Femoral Replacement in Nontumor Cases with Severe Bone Loss and Instability
    Berend, Keith R.
    Lombardi, Adolph V., Jr.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (02) : 485 - 492
  • [4] Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial
    Bobyn, JD
    Stackpool, GJ
    Hacking, SA
    Tanzer, M
    Krygier, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1999, 81B (05): : 907 - 914
  • [5] Revision total knee arthroplasty by impaction bone grafting
    Bradley, GW
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2000, (371) : 113 - 118
  • [6] BRAND MG, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P71
  • [7] BROOKS PJ, 1984, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P302
  • [8] The use of structural allograft for uncontained defects in revision total knee arthroplasty - A minimum five-year review
    Clatworthy, MG
    Ballance, J
    Brick, GW
    Chandler, HP
    Gross, AE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A (03) : 404 - 411
  • [9] Bone loss in total knee arthroplasty - Graft augment and options
    Cuckler, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2004, 19 (04) : 56 - 58
  • [10] Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement
    Dawson, J
    Fitzpatrick, R
    Murray, D
    Carr, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1998, 80B (01): : 63 - 69