Why and How Combining Strong and Weak Ties within a Single Interorganizational R&D Collaboration Outperforms Other Collaboration Structures

被引:85
作者
Michelfelder, Ingo [1 ]
Kratzer, Jan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Ctr Entrepreneurship, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Berlin, Sch Econ & Management, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
关键词
SOCIAL NETWORKS; MEDIATING ROLE; EXPLOITATION; EXPLORATION; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; PERFORMANCE; CREATIVITY; BIOTECHNOLOGY; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1111/jpim.12052
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate why and how an ambidextrous interorganizational R&D collaboration outperforms other collaboration structures in the creation of innovation. This research effort contributes to a growing stream of research in social network theory suggesting that the contradictory theories of the strength of weak ties and weak network structures on the one hand and the theory of strong ties and closed network structures on the other have a mutually reinforcing effect on innovation outcomes if combined rather than considered separately. An in-depth exploratory single case study approach within an innovatively organized national R&D collaboration allowed giving further evidence for such a superior innovation performance and for this research to contribute to theory by demonstrating why and how such a combination may lead to higher innovation output and how this effect can be actively reinforced. It is suggested that the combination of strong and weak ties should occur at the individual rather than at the project or firm level. The authors distinguish between the additive effects of the respective innovation benefits of strong and weak ties, a positive interaction effect in the portfolio of dyadic ties of an individual and a second multilevel interaction effect of weak ties embedded in the ambidextrous network structure. Referring to previous empirical findings, intellectual property regulation and structural interdependency between network members showed a higher impact than trust with regard to leveraging weak ties and are important sources for achieving the multilevel interaction effect. Managerial implications of this research are that a large network will outperform several smaller, independent networks given that the right structure and processes are in place. Direct implications for the architecture of an ambidextrous R&D collaboration are discussed, and a framework for a new form of technology R&D collaboration called semi-open organization is presented, which places itself between the extremes of traditional R&D in closed organizations and completely open innovation approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:1159 / 1177
页数:19
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [1] Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study
    Ahuja, G
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) : 425 - 455
  • [2] Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation
    Andriopoulos, Constantine
    Lewis, Marianne W.
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) : 696 - 717
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1992, Structural Holes
  • [4] Atlas. ti Scientific Software Development GmbH, 2012, ATL TI QUAL DAT AN
  • [5] The Strength-of-Weak-Ties Perspective on Creativity: A Comprehensive Examination and Extension
    Baer, Markus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 95 (03) : 592 - 601
  • [6] Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications
    Barratt, Mark
    Choi, Thomas Y.
    Li, Mei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (04) : 329 - 342
  • [7] Baum JAC, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P267, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-8
  • [9] On Network Theory
    Borgatti, Stephen P.
    Halgin, Daniel S.
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (05) : 1168 - 1181
  • [10] Network Analysis in the Social Sciences
    Borgatti, Stephen P.
    Mehra, Ajay
    Brass, Daniel J.
    Labianca, Giuseppe
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2009, 323 (5916) : 892 - 895