Effects of duodenal transection timing on clinical short-term outcomes of patients with laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer

被引:0
作者
Zheng, Zifang [1 ]
Wu, Limin [1 ]
Jian, Chenxing [1 ]
Song, Yucheng [1 ]
Liu, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Putian Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Minimally Invas Surg, 999 Dongzhen East Rd, Putian 351100, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
Gastric cancer; Proximal gastric cancer; Duodenal transection timing; Laparoscopy; Laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy; Lymphadenectomy; HUANGS 3-STEP MANEUVER; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; TOTAL GASTRECTOMY;
D O I
10.1186/s12957-019-1590-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundTo determine the optimal timing of duodenal transection in patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) in combination with laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (LSPL) for advanced proximal gastric cancer (APGC).MethodsOne hundred twenty-seven patients with APGC who received LATG with duodenal transection as well as LSPL between January 2017 and July 2018 were retrospectively recruited in this study. According to the different transection timing, the patients were allocated into two groups: a conventional group (CG) who received the duodenal transection prior to the LSPL and an experimental group (EG) who were given LSPL before the duodenum was transected. Clinical short-term outcomes were compared in the two groups.ResultsAnalysis of the demographical and clinical characteristics showed that the two groups were comparable with no significant differences between CG and EG in the study patients regardless of their body mass indices (BMI). The intraoperative and postoperative indicators for clinical short-term outcomes were compared between the CG and EC, and results indicated that the EG had significant shorter mean time of LSPL and total operation time than those in the CG (P<0.05). Of note, the numbers of patients with intraoperative injury and the volume of blood loss during the LSPL procedure were significantly reduced in the EG versus CG (P<0.05). For the obese APGC patients, administration of LSPL prior to duodenal transection significantly increased the number of dissected No.10 lymph nodes (LNs) (P<0.05). The other intraoperative and postoperative indicators did not show any differences between the two comparison groups.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrated that duodenal transection timing was significantly associated with clinical short-term outcomes of APGC patients. The duodenal transection prior to the LSPL is superior overall to the conventional transection timing in the treatment of APGC patients with LATG and LSPL in combination.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A preoperatively predictive difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: experience from a large-scale single center
    Li, Ping
    Huang, Chang-Ming
    Lin, Jian-Xian
    Zheng, Chao-Hui
    Xie, Jian-Wei
    Wang, Jia-Bin
    Lu, Jun
    Chen, Qi-Yue
    Cao, Long-Long
    Lin, Mi
    Tu, Ru-Hong
    Chen, Rui Fu
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (09): : 4092 - 4101
  • [32] Laparoscopic spleen-preserving No. 10 lymph node dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer in left approach: a new operation procedure
    Wang Jia-Bin
    Huang Chang-Ming
    Zheng Chao-Hui
    Li Ping
    Xie Jian-Wei
    Lin Jian-Xian
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 10
  • [33] Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving No. 10 Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer Using a Left Approach
    Chang-Ming Huang
    Qi-Yue Chen
    Jian-Xian Lin
    Chao-Hui Zheng
    Ping Li
    Jian-Wei Xie
    Jia-Bin Wang
    Jun Lu
    Xin-Tao Yang
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2014, 21 : 2051 - 2051
  • [34] Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic spleen-preserving No. 10 lymph node dissection for locally advanced upper third gastric cancer: a prospective, multicenter clinical trial
    Zheng, Chao-Hui
    Xu, Yan-Chang
    Zhao, Gang
    Cai, Li-Sheng
    Li, Guo-Xin
    Xu, Ze-Kuan
    Yan, Su
    Wu, Zu-Guang
    Xue, Fang-Qin
    Sun, Yi-Hong
    Xu, Dong-Bo
    Zhang, Wen-Bin
    Jin-Wan
    Yu, Pei-Wu
    Hu, Jian-Kun
    Su, Xiang-Qian
    Ji, Jia-Fu
    Li, Zi-Yu
    You, Jun
    Li, Yong
    Lin-Fan
    Jun-Lu
    Ping-Li
    Huang, Chang-Ming
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (11): : 5062 - 5073
  • [35] Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic D2 lymphadenectomy with complete mesogastrium excision for advanced gastric cancer
    Xie, Daxing
    Yu, Chaoran
    Liu, Liang
    Osaiweran, Hasan
    Gao, Chun
    Hu, Junbo
    Gong, Jianping
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (11): : 5138 - 5139
  • [36] Station 10 lymph node dissections in laparoscopic-assisted spleen-preserving radical gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer
    Li, Yong
    Wang, Junjiang
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 25 (04) : 465 - 467
  • [37] Huang's three-step maneuver for laparoscopic spleen-preserving No.10 lymph node dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer
    Chang-Ming Huang
    Qi-Yue Chen
    Jian-Xian Lin
    Chao-Hui Zheng
    Ping Li
    Jian-Wei Xie
    Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, 2014, (02) : 208 - 210
  • [38] Huang's three-step maneuver for laparoscopic spleen-preserving No. 10 lymph node dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer
    Huang, Chang-Ming
    Chen, Qi-Yue
    Lin, Jian-Xian
    Zheng, Chao-Hui
    Li, Ping
    Xie, Jian-Wei
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 26 (02) : 208 - 210
  • [39] Station 10 lymph node dissections in laparoscopic-assisted spleen-preserving radical gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer
    Yong Li
    Junjiang Wang
    Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, 2013, 25 (04) : 465 - 467
  • [40] Is three-dimensional laparoscopic spleen preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer better than that of two-dimensional? Analysis of a prospective clinical research study
    Zhi-Yu Liu
    Qi-Yue Chen
    Qing Zhong
    Jian-Wei Xie
    Jia-Bin Wang
    Jian-Xian Lin
    Jun Lu
    Long-Long Cao
    Mi Lin
    Ru-Hong Tu
    Ze-Ning Huang
    Ju-Li Lin
    Hua-Long Zheng
    Chao-Hui Zheng
    Chang-Ming Huang
    Ping Li
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2019, 33 : 3425 - 3435