Rope-based oral fluid sampling for early detection of classical swine fever in domestic pigs at group level

被引:21
作者
Dietze, Klaas [1 ]
Tucakov, Anna [1 ]
Engel, Tatjana [1 ]
Wirtz, Sabine [1 ]
Depner, Klaus [1 ]
Globig, Anja [1 ]
Kammerer, Robert [1 ]
Mouchantat, Susan [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Loeffler Inst, Fed Res Inst Anim Hlth, Sudufer 10, D-17493 Greifswald, Germany
来源
BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH | 2017年 / 13卷
关键词
Non-invasive; Rope-in-a-bait; Surveillance; Hog cholera; Group level; Backyard pig production; WILD BOAR; VIRUS; DISEASE; SURVEILLANCE; INFECTION; VIRULENCE; STRAINS;
D O I
10.1186/s12917-016-0930-2
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Background: Non-invasive sampling techniques based on the analysis of oral fluid specimen have gained substantial importance in the field of swine herd management. Methodological advances have a focus on endemic viral diseases in commercial pig production. More recently, these approaches have been adapted to non-invasive sampling of wild boar for transboundary animal disease detection for which these effective population level sampling methods have not been available. In this study, a rope-in-a-bait based oral fluid sampling technique was tested to detect classical swine fever virus nucleic acid shedding from experimentally infected domestic pigs. Results: Separated in two groups treated identically, the course of the infection was slightly differing in terms of onset of the clinical signs and levels of viral ribonucleic acid detection in the blood and oral fluid. The technique was capable of detecting classical swine fever virus nucleic acid as of day 7 post infection coinciding with the first detection in conventional oropharyngeal swab samples from some individual animals. Except for day 7 post infection in the "slower onset group", the chances of classical swine fever virus nucleic acid detection in ropes were identical or higher as compared to the individual sampling. Conclusions: With the provided evidence, non-invasive oral fluid sampling at group level can be considered as additional cost-effective detection tool in classical swine fever prevention and control strategies. The proposed methodology is of particular use in production systems with reduced access to veterinary services such as backyard or scavenging pig production where it can be integrated in feeding or baiting practices.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Surveillance of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in susceptible wildlife and domestic ungulates in Southeast of Bulgaria following a FMD case in wild boar
    Alexandrov, Tsviatko
    Stefanov, Dimitar
    Kamenov, Pencho
    Miteva, Alexandra
    Khomenko, Sergei
    Sumption, Keith
    Meyer-Gerbaulet, Hinrich
    Depner, Klaus
    [J]. VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 166 (1-2) : 84 - 90
  • [2] Prospects of improved classical swine fever control in backyard pigs through oral vaccination
    Dietze, Klaas
    Milicevic, Vesna
    Depner, Klaus
    [J]. BERLINER UND MUNCHENER TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2013, 126 (11-12): : 476 - 480
  • [3] Comparison of viraemia- and clinical-based estimates of within- and between-pen transmission of classical swine fever virus from three transmission experiments
    Durand, Benoit
    Davila, Sylvie
    Cariolet, Roland
    Mesplede, Alain
    Le Potier, Marie-Frederique
    [J]. VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 135 (3-4) : 196 - 204
  • [4] Detection of African swine fever, classical swine fever, and foot-and-mouth disease viruses in swine oral fluids by multiplex reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction
    Grau, Frederic R.
    Schroeder, Megan E.
    Mulhern, Erin L.
    McIntosh, Michael T.
    Bounpheng, Mangkey A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 2015, 27 (02) : 140 - 149
  • [5] Validation of a real-time RT-PCR assay for sensitive and specific detection of classical swine fever
    Hoffmann, B
    Beer, M
    Schelp, C
    Schirrmeier, H
    Depner, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2005, 130 (1-2) : 36 - 44
  • [6] Studies on the virulence of two field isolates of the classical swine fever virus genotype 2.3 Rostock in wild boars of different age groups
    Kaden, V
    Lange, E
    Polster, U
    Klopfleisch, R
    Teifke, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE SERIES B-INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND VETERINARY PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 51 (05): : 202 - 208
  • [7] Analysis of classical swine fever virus replication kinetics allows differentiation of highly virulent from avirulent strains
    Mittelholzer, C
    Moser, C
    Tratschin, JD
    Hofmann, MA
    [J]. VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 74 (04) : 293 - 308
  • [8] Introduction to classical swine fever: virus, disease and control policy
    Moennig, V
    [J]. VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 73 (2-3) : 93 - 102
  • [9] Proof of principle: Non-invasive sampling for early detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus infection in wild boar using a rope-in-a-bait sampling technique
    Mouchantat, Susan
    Haas, Bernd
    Boehle, Wolfgang
    Globig, Anja
    Lange, Elke
    Mettenleiter, Thomas C.
    Depner, Klaus
    [J]. VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 172 (1-2) : 329 - 333
  • [10] Novel rope-based sampling of classical swine fever shedding in a group of wild boar showing low contagiosity upon experimental infection with a classical swine fever field strain of genotype 2.3
    Mouchantat, Susan
    Globig, Anja
    Boehle, Wolfgang
    Petrov, Anja
    Strebelow, Heinz-Guenther
    Mettenleiter, Thomas C.
    Depner, Klaus
    [J]. VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 170 (3-4) : 425 - 429