New method for studying the relationship between morphological parameters and cell viability

被引:3
作者
Xiong, JW [1 ]
Dai, WP
Chen, L
Liu, GX
Liu, MS
Zhang, ZX
Xiao, H
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Key Lab Biomed Informat Engn, Minist Educ, Sch Life Sci & Technol, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[2] South China Normal Univ, Sch Phys & Telecommun Engn, Guangzhou 510631, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Univ Technol, Dept Phys, Guangzhou 510090, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Hunan Shaoyang Univ, Shaoyang 422000, Peoples R China
来源
2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCED OPTICAL MANUFACTURING AND TESTING TECHNOLOGIES: OPTICAL TEST AND MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY AND EQUIPMENT, PTS 1 AND 2 | 2006年 / 6150卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
differences of morphology; morphological parameters; cell viability determination;
D O I
10.1117/12.676524
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Based on the morphological differences between normal, apoptosis and necrosis cell, a new method for detection cell viability is presented in the paper. The Jurkat cells samples were used for studying the relationship between morphological parameters and cell viability in the paper. According to the scatter charts of Jurkat cell roundness, radius ratio and area, the cell areas were mainly distributed from 40 mu m(2) to 80 mu m(2). The percentage of main areas in the two cells samples were analyzed statistically with values of 62.37% and 75.45% respectively. Due to the mostly normal cell used by the experiment in the exponent growth period, a conclusion that the areas of normal cells were mainly distributed from 40 mu m(2) to 80 mu m(2) is presented. And the areas of apoptosis and necrosis cells are distributed in other range, i.e. less than 40 mu m(2) or more than 80 mu m(2). There are not any chemical medicaments needed to add in the samples by the method based on the videopicture in order to detect the states of cell samples. What it reflected by analyzing morphological parameters of cell are the true states of cell.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] LIU MS, 2003, J LASER, V24, P70
  • [2] Romer David J., 2003, Anatomical Record, V272B, P91, DOI 10.1002/ar.b.10017
  • [3] Sysoeva VY, 2003, BIOL MEMBRANY, V20, P288
  • [4] XIN H, 2001, EXPT CELL BIOL, P188
  • [5] YANG JC, 2003, MED CELL ENG, P164
  • [6] YI WC, 2004, EVALUATION CLASSIFIC