Analysis of Stereotactic Accuracy in Patients Undergoing Deep Brain Stimulation Using Nexframe and the Leksell Frame

Objective: To determine and compare the accuracy of Nexframe and the Leksell stereotactic frame in deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedures. Background: The 'frameless' Nexframe uses bone fiducials rather than a head-mounted frame, which offers potential benefits for both the patient and the surgical team. Accuracy of lead implantation and factors affecting this accuracy are of crucial importance but have not been extensively studied for the frameless system. Design/Methods: The location of 194 (Leksell frame, n = 116; Nexframe, n = 78) DBS leads was determined on postoperative MRI. Obtained stereotactic coordinates were compared with expected intraoperative target coordinates. Resulting absolute errors in the X (medial-lateral), Y (anteri-or-posterior), and Z (dorsal-ventral) coordinates (Delta X, Delta Y, and Delta Z) were then used to calculate the vector error (VE). The vector error describes the total error in 3-D space and represents our main outcome measure. Results: The vector error mean +/- SD) was 2.8 +/- 1.3 for Nexframe and 2.5 +/- 1.2 for the Leksell frame (p = 0.43). For Nexframe, absolute X, Y, and Z errors were 1.4 +/- 1.3, 1.7 +/- 1.2, and 1.0 +/- 0.9 mm. For the Leksell frame, the absolute X, Y, and Z errors were 1.4 +/- 1.0, 1.2 +/- 1.0, and 1.3 +/- 0.9 mm. On the anterior-posterior plane (Y coordinate), the Leksell frame was more accurate than Nexframe (p = 0.04). In contrast, Nexframe was more accurate on the dorsal-ventral plane (Z coordinate) (p = 0.04). There was no difference in accuracy between the two methods on the medial-lateral plane (X coordinate). Conclusion: This comparison of Nexframe and the Leksell frame shows that both techniques have equivalent overall 3-D accuracy. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel