Comparing the Real-World Effectiveness of Competing Colonoscopy Preparations: Results of a Prospective Trial

被引:35
作者
Gu, Phillip [1 ,2 ]
Lew, Daniel [1 ,3 ]
Oh, Sun Jung [1 ]
Vipani, Aarshi [1 ]
Ko, Jeffrey [1 ]
Hsu, Kevin [1 ]
Mirakhor, Ebrahim [1 ]
Pattisapu, Varun [1 ]
Bullen, Tia [1 ,3 ]
Fuller, Garth [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Spiegel, Brennan M. R. [1 ]
Almario, Christopher V. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] UT Southwestern, Div Digest & Liver Dis, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Div Digest & Liver Dis, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[4] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Div Hlth Serv Res, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[5] CS CORE, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Div Informat, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[7] UCLA Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
INADEQUATE BOWEL PREPARATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL; COLORECTAL-CANCER; ELECTROLYTE-SOLUTION; MIRALAX-GATORADE; TASK-FORCE; QUALITY; SPLIT; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.14309/ajg.0000000000000057
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES:National societies provide little guidance regarding which colonoscopy bowel preps are best tolerated and most effective; this reflects a lack of comparative effectiveness studies that directly evaluate the available preps in a real-world setting. To address this gap, we conducted a prospective, commercially unfunded comparative effectiveness study of currently available bowel preps and measured their impact on bowel cleansing.METHODS:We included patients aged 18 years, who presented for an outpatient colonoscopy at a large medical center serving more than 70 academic and community-based endoscopists who are free to prescribe the bowel prep of their choice. The primary outcome was bowel cleansing quality as measured by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. We performed regression models with random effects on the outcomes to adjust for confounding.RESULTS:Approximately 4,339 colonoscopies were performed by 75 endoscopists. Magnesium citrate, MiraLAX with Gatorade, MoviPrep, OsmoPrep, Prepopik/Clenpiq, and Suprep all had significantly higher prep tolerability compared with GoLYTELY (all P < 0.05). For bowel cleansing, Suprep (7.28 1.66; P < 0.001), MoviPrep (7.11 +/- 1.62; P = 0.004), and MiraLAX with Gatorade (7.09 +/- 1.64; P < 0.001) had higher total Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores compared with GoLYTELY (6.67 +/- 1.87); there were no significant differences among the remaining preps. Split-prep dosing was associated with better cleansing; however, men, opioid and tricyclic antidepressent users, and patients with diabetes and cirrhosis had worse cleansing (all P < 0.05).CONCLUSIONS:In this prospective, real-world comparative effectiveness study of available bowel preps, we found that MiraLAX with Gatorade, MoviPrep, and Suprep were prospectively associated with superior tolerability and bowel cleansing.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 314
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
American Cancer Society, 2017, CANC FACTS FIG 2017
[2]   Screening for Colorectal Cancer US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement [J].
Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten ;
Grossman, David C. ;
Curry, Susan J. ;
Davidson, Karina W. ;
Epling, John W., Jr. ;
Garcia, Francisco A. R. ;
Gillman, Matthew W. ;
Harper, Diane M. ;
Kemper, Alex R. ;
Krist, Alex H. ;
Kurth, Ann E. ;
Landefeld, C. Seth ;
Mangione, Carol M. ;
Owens, Douglas K. ;
Phillips, William R. ;
Phipps, Maureen G. ;
Pignone, Michael P. ;
Siu, Albert L. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 315 (23) :2564-2575
[3]   Results of a prospective randomised multicentre controlled trial comparing a new 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol and electrolyte solution vs. sodium phosphate solution in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy [J].
Bitoun, A. ;
Ponchon, T. ;
Barthet, M. ;
Coffin, B. ;
Dugue, C. ;
Halphen, M. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 24 (11-12) :1631-1642
[4]   Explaining persistent under-use of colonoscopic cancer screening in African Americans: A systematic review [J].
Bromley, Erica G. ;
May, Folasade P. ;
Federer, Lisa ;
Spiegel, Brennan M. R. ;
van Oijen, Martijn G. H. .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 71 :40-48
[5]   Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale [J].
Calderwood, Audrey H. ;
Jacobson, Brian C. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 72 (04) :686-692
[6]   Phosphate tablets or polyethylene glycol for preparation to colonoscopy? A multicentre non-inferiority randomized controlled trial [J].
Chaussade, Stanislas ;
Schmoecker, Christoph ;
Toulemonde, Pierre ;
Munoz-Navas, Miguel ;
O'Mahony, Valerie ;
Henri, Franck .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (05) :2166-2173
[7]   Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy [J].
Chokshi, Reena V. ;
Hovis, Christine E. ;
Hollander, Thomas ;
Early, Dayna S. ;
Wang, Jean S. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (06) :1197-1203
[8]   Patient Factors Predictive of Inadequate Bowel Preparation Using Polyethylene Glycol A Prospective Study in Korea [J].
Chung, Yong Woo ;
Han, Dong Soo ;
Park, Kwang Hyuk ;
Kim, Kyoung Oh ;
Park, Cheol Hee ;
Hahn, Taeho ;
Yoo, Kyo-Sang ;
Park, Sang Hoon ;
Kim, Jong Hyeok ;
Park, Choong Kee .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 43 (05) :448-452
[9]  
Dawwas MF, 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, V370, P2539, DOI [10.1056/NEJMc1405329, 10.1056/NEJMoa1309086]
[10]   Predicting inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in participants receiving split-dose bowel preparation: development and validation of a prediction score [J].
Dik, Vincent K. ;
Moons, Leon M. G. ;
Huyuk, Melek ;
van der Schaar, Peter ;
Cappel, Wouter H. de Vos Tot Nederveen ;
ter Borg, Pieter C. J. ;
Meijssen, Maarten A. C. ;
Ouwendijk, Rob J. T. H. ;
Le Fevre, Doris M. ;
Stouten, Merijn ;
van der Galien, Onno ;
Hiemstra, Theo J. ;
Monkelbaan, Jan F. ;
van Oijen, Martijn G. H. ;
Siersema, Peter D. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (03) :665-672