共 50 条
Frailty Combined with Loneliness or Social Isolation: An Elevated Risk for Mortality in Later Life
被引:84
|作者:
Hoogendijk, Emiel O.
[1
]
Smit, Annelot P.
[1
]
van Dam, Carmen
[2
]
Schuster, Noah A.
[1
]
de Breij, Sascha
[1
]
Holwerda, Tjalling J.
[1
]
Huisman, Martijn
[1
,3
]
Dent, Elsa
[4
,5
]
Andrew, Melissa K.
[6
]
机构:
[1] Amsterdam UMC Locat VU Univ, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amsterdam UMC Locat VU Univ, Dept Internal Med & Geriatr, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Social Sci, Dept Sociol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Torrens Univ Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Baker Heart & Diabet Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Med, Div Geriatr Med, Halifax, NS, Canada
关键词:
physical frailty;
loneliness;
social isolation;
longitudinal study;
social vulnerability;
OLDER-ADULTS;
POPULATION;
PREVALENCE;
AMSTERDAM;
HEALTH;
MEN;
D O I:
10.1111/jgs.16716
中图分类号:
R592 [老年病学];
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号:
03 ;
0303 ;
100203 ;
摘要:
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Frailty, loneliness, and social isolation are all associated with adverse outcomes in older adults, but little is known about their combined impact on mortality. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. PARTICIPANTS Community-dwelling older adults aged 65 and older (n = 1,427). MEASUREMENTS Frailty was measured with the frailty phenotype (Fried criteria). Loneliness was assessed with the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale. Social isolation was operationalized using information on partner status, social support, and network size. Two categorical variables were created, for each possible combination regarding frailty and loneliness (FL) and frailty and social isolation (FS), respectively. Mortality was monitored over a period of 22 years (1995-2017). Survival curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to study the effects of the FL and FS combinations on mortality. Analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic factors, depression, chronic diseases, and smoking. RESULTS Frailty prevalence was 13%, and 5.9% of the sample were frail and lonely, and 6.2% frail and socially isolated. In fully adjusted models, older adults who were only frail had a higher risk of mortality compared with people without any of the conditions (hazard ratio [HR] range = 1.40-1.48;P < .01). However, the highest risk of mortality was observed in people with a combined presence of frailty and loneliness or social isolation (HRFL= 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.42-2.37; HRFS= 1.77; 95% CI = 1.36-2.30). Sensitivity analyses using a frailty index based on the deficit accumulation approach instead of the frailty phenotype showed similar results, confirming the robustness of our findings. CONCLUSION Frail older adults are at increased risk of mortality, but this risk is even higher for those who are also lonely or socially isolated. To optimize well-being and health outcomes in physically frail older adults, targeted interventions focusing on both subjective and objective social vulnerability are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:2587 / 2593
页数:7
相关论文