It Is Time to Re-Evaluate the Peer Review Process for Preclinical Research

被引：3
作者：
Bhattacharya, Rajat [1 ]
Ellis, Lee M. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Mol & Cellular Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源：
BIOESSAYS | 2018年 / 40卷 / 01期
基金：
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词：
peer review; publication;
D O I：
10.1002/bies.201700185
中图分类号：
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号：
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要：
Problems in peer review, the backbone of maintaining high standards in scientific publishing, have led to wide spread discontent within the scientific community. Training in the peer review process and a simpler format to assist in decision making are possible courses to improve and expedite the process of peer review and scientific publishing.
引用
收藏
页数：3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A history and development of peer-review process
    Jana, Siladitya
    ANNALS OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION STUDIES, 2019, 66 (04) : 152 - 162
  • [42] Journal peer review as an information retrieval process
    Bornmann, Lutz
    Egghe, Leo
    JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2012, 68 (04) : 527 - 535
  • [43] Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process
    Alexandru Marcoci
    Ans Vercammen
    Martin Bush
    Daniel G. Hamilton
    Anca Hanea
    Victoria Hemming
    Bonnie C. Wintle
    Mark Burgman
    Fiona Fidler
    BMC Research Notes, 15
  • [44] Improving the peer review process with information technology
    Mandviwalla, Munir
    Patnayakuni, Ravi
    Schuff, David
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2008, 46 (01) : 29 - 40
  • [45] What is the sensitivity and specificity of the peer review process?
    Garcia, Jose A.
    Chamorro-Padial, Jorge
    Rodriguez-Sanchez, Rosa
    Fdez-Valdivia, J.
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2024, 31 (04): : 305 - 326
  • [46] Peer review of the curriculum as a continuous process of improvement
    Marlowe, Karen F.
    Wargo, Kurt A.
    Kelley, Kristi W.
    CURRENTS IN PHARMACY TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2012, 4 (03) : 157 - 164
  • [47] The Peer Review Process in Science Education Journals
    Dale Baker
    Research in Science Education, 2002, 32 : 171 - 180
  • [48] Nurse editors' views on the peer review process
    Kearney, MH
    Freda, MC
    RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2005, 28 (06) : 444 - 452
  • [49] Peering at the peer review process for conference submissions
    Gardner, Anne
    Willey, Keith
    Jolly, Lesley
    Tibbits, Gregory
    2012 FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2012,
  • [50] Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process
    Marcoci, Alexandru
    Vercammen, Ans
    Bush, Martin
    Hamilton, Daniel G.
    Hanea, Anca
    Hemming, Victoria
    Wintle, Bonnie C.
    Burgman, Mark
    Fidler, Fiona
    BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2022, 15 (01)
12345