Conventional Microscope-Integrated Intraoperative OCT Versus Digitally Enabled Intraoperative OCT in Vitreoretinal Surgery in the DISCOVER Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare conventional microscope-integrated intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) and digitally enabled microscope-integrated iOCT in vitreoretinal surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis of the DISCOVER prospective iOCT study, two surgical groups were compared: (1) conventional iOCT and (2) digitally enabled iOCT. Surgeon questionnaires were collected immediately following surgery. RESULTS: A total of 187 subjects wore included in the study: 91 in the conventional iOCT group and 96 in the digitally enabled iOCT group. There were no differences in surgeon-perceived iOCT utility between the two groups. There was significantly higher surgical field-based visualization of the iOCT datastream in the digitally enabled iOCT group (67.7% vs. 3.3%; P < .0001). Reported significant back discomfort (1.0% vs. 18.7%; P < .0001) and headaches (5.2% vs. 20.9%; P < .002) were lower in the digitally enabled iOCT group. CONCLUSIONS: Feasibility and utility of iOCT were similar in both groups. Digitally enabled iOCT datastream enabled increased attention on the surgical field during OCT review.