Sustainable waste management: Waste to energy plant as an alternative to landfill

被引:144
作者
Cucchiella, Federica [1 ]
D'Adamo, Idiano [1 ]
Gastaldi, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aquila, Dept Ind & Informat Engn & Econ, Via G Gronchi 18, I-67100 Laquila, Italy
关键词
Environmental analysis; Financial analysis; Social analysis; Sustainability; Waste to energy; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; DECISION-SUPPORT; INCINERATION; RECOVERY; TECHNOLOGIES; GASIFICATION; SYSTEMS; MSW;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2016.11.012
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The management of municipal solid waste (MSW) has been identified as one of the global challenges that must be carefully faced in order to achieve sustainability goals. European Union (EU) has defined as Waste to Energy (WTE) technology is able to create synergies with EU energy and climate policy, without compromising the achievement of higher reuse and recycling rates. The methodology used in this paper is based on two levels. A strategy analysis defines the amount of waste to incinerate with energy recovery considering different approaches based on unsorted waste, landfilled waste and separated collection rate, respectively. Consequently, it is evaluated the sustainability of a WTE plant as an alternative to landfill for a specific area. Two indicators are used: the Reduction of the Emissions of equivalent Carbon Dioxide (ERco2eq) and Financial Net Present Value (FNPV). Furthermore, a social analysis is conducted through interviews to identify the most critical elements determining the aversion toward the WTE realization. The obtained results show the opportunity to realize a 150 kt plant in the only electrical configuration. In fact, the cogenerative configuration reaches better environmental performances, but it is not profitable for this size. Profits are equal to 25.4 sic per kiloton of treated waste and 370 kgCO(2)eq per ton of treated waste are avoided using a WTE plant as an alternative to landfill. In this way, the percentage of energy recovery ranges from 21% to 25% in examined scenarios and disposal waste is minimised in order to preserve resources for the future. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 31
页数:14
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Social acceptance for the development of a waste-to-energy plant in an urban area [J].
Achillas, Ch. ;
Vlachokostas, Ch. ;
Moussiopoulos, N. ;
Banias, G. ;
Kafetzopoulos, G. ;
Karagiannidis, A. .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2011, 55 (9-10) :857-863
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, CIRC EC PACK QUEST A
[3]  
[Anonymous], SUST SOL WAST MAN GR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, STAT DAT
[5]   Ranking municipal solid waste treatment alternatives considering sustainability criteria using the analytical hierarchical process tool [J].
Antonopoulos, I. -S. ;
Perkoulidis, G. ;
Logothetis, D. ;
Karkanias, C. .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2014, 86 :149-159
[6]   Environmental performance and energy recovery potential of five processes for municipal solid waste treatment [J].
Arafat, Hassan A. ;
Jijakli, Kenan ;
Ahsan, Amimul .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 105 :233-240
[7]   A life cycle assessment of environmental performances of two combustion- and gasification-based waste-to-energy technologies [J].
Arena, Umberto ;
Ardolino, Filomena ;
Di Gregorio, Fabrizio .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 41 :60-74
[8]   Element partitioning in combustion- and gasification-based waste-to-energy units [J].
Arena, Umberto ;
Di Gregorio, Fabrizio .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 33 (05) :1142-1150
[9]   The environmental comparison of landfilling vs. incineration of MSW accounting for waste diversion [J].
Assamoi, Bernadette ;
Lawryshyn, Yuri .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (05) :1019-1030
[10]   Incineration and co-combustion of waste: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions [J].
Astrup, Thomas ;
Moller, Jacob ;
Fruergaard, Thilde .
WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2009, 27 (08) :789-799