Learning before the storm: Modeling multiple stakeholder activities in support of crisis management, a practical case

被引:29
作者
Hernantes, Josune [1 ]
Rich, Eliot [2 ]
Lauge, Ana [1 ]
Labaka, Leire [1 ]
Sarriegi, Jose M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tecnun Univ Navarra, San Sebastian 20018, Spain
[2] SUNY Albany, Sch Business, Albany, NY 12222 USA
关键词
Crisis management; Modeling; System Dynamics; Group Model Building; INFRASTRUCTURE; INTERDEPENDENCIES; LESSONS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2013.01.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The severe consequences of a Critical Infrastructure (Cl) crisis demand continued research directed toward proactive and reactive management strategies. Despite the best efforts of governments and communities, the diversity of stakeholders, conflicting demands for resources, and a lack of trust among organizations create complexities that limit the effectiveness of the response. This paper identifies four specific problems that appear to reoccur when Us are challenged: heterogeneity, multiple and inconsistent boundaries, resilience building and knowledge transfer and sharing. A combination of collaborative modeling and software simulation methodologies is proposed in order to identify the interrelationships among diverse stakeholders when managing the preparation for and reaction to a Cl crisis. This approach allows experts to work together and share experiences through the modeling process which can lead them to a better understanding of how other organizations work and integrate different perspectives. In addition, simulation models enable domain experts to understand the consequences of certain policies in the short and long terms, thus improving the crisis managers' knowledge for future crisis situations. This paper presents a practical case of a hypothetical crisis in the Cl sector and the approach used in order to deal with the four problems identified above. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1742 / 1755
页数:14
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] Abrahamsson M., 2010, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, V18, P14, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-5973.2009.00601.X
  • [2] Using a group decision support system to add value to group model building
    Ackermann, Fran
    Andersen, David F.
    Eden, Colin
    Richardson, George P.
    [J]. SYSTEM DYNAMICS REVIEW, 2010, 26 (04) : 335 - 346
  • [3] Group model building: problem structuring, policy simulation and decision support
    Andersen, D. F.
    Vennix, J. A. M.
    Richardson, G. P.
    Rouwette, E. A. J. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2007, 58 (05) : 691 - 694
  • [4] Andersen DF, 1997, SYST DYNAM REV, V13, P107, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199722)13:2<107::AID-SDR120>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-7
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2011, INT C INF SYST CRIS
  • [7] [Anonymous], EC COSTS NAT DIS AUS
  • [8] [Anonymous], 20 WORLD C DIS MAN T
  • [9] [Anonymous], IMPACT NATURAL DISAS
  • [10] [Anonymous], RES INFR C ROT