Valuing Compromise for the Common Good

被引:5
作者
Gutmann, Amy [1 ,2 ]
Thompson, Dennis [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Univ Ctr Human Values, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Dept Govt, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, John F Kennedy Sch Govt, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Edmond J Safra Ctr Eth, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1162/DAED_a_00212
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Pursuing the common good in a pluralist democracy is not possible without making compromises. Yet the spirit of compromise is in short supply in contemporary American politics. The permanent campaign has made compromise more difficult to achieve, as the uncompromising mindset suitable for campaigning has come to dominate the task of governing. To begin to make compromise more feasible and the common good more attainable, we need to appreciate the distinctive value of compromise and recognize the misconceptions that stand in its way. A common mistake is to assume that compromise requires finding the common ground on which all can agree. That undermines more realistic efforts to seek classic compromises, in which each party gains by sacrificing something valuable to the other, and together they serve the common good by improving upon the status quo. Institutional reforms are desirable, but they, too, cannot get off the ground without the support of leaders and citizens who learn how and when to adopt a compromising mindset.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 198
页数:14
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DEMOCRACY DISAGREEME
[2]  
[Anonymous], FUTURE GLOBAL MUSLIM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, CBS News
[4]  
Ballasy Nicolas, 2011, DAILY CALLER 1017
[5]  
Brettschneider Corey, 2010, DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS SU, P34
[6]  
Burke, 1908, SPEECHES LETT AM AFF, P130
[7]  
Burke Edmund, 1987, THE FOUNDERS' CONSTITUTION, V1, P391
[8]  
Dworkin Ronald, 2008, IS DEMOCRACY POSSIBL, V5, p[112, 132]
[9]  
Gutmann A, 2012, SPIRIT OF COMPROMISE: WHY GOVERNING DEMANDS IT AND CAMPAIGNING UNDERMINES IT, P167
[10]  
Gutmann Amy, 2004, WHY DELIBERATIVE DEM, P95