Secondary non-invasive prenatal screening for fetal trisomy: an effectiveness study in a public health setting

被引:12
作者
Guy, G. P. [1 ,2 ]
Hargrave, J. [1 ,3 ]
Dunn, R. [3 ]
Price, K. [3 ]
Short, J. [3 ]
Thilaganathan, B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Fetal Med Unit, Blackshaw Rd, London SW17 0RE, England
[2] St Georges Univ London, Vasc Biol Res Ctr, Mol & Clin Sci Res Inst, London, England
[3] St Georges Univ London, St Georges Antenatal Fetal Evaluat SAFE Lab, St Georges Hosp, London, England
关键词
Cell-free DNA; failed sample; fetal fraction; first-trimester screening; no-call rate; non-invasive prenatal testing; trisomy; 13; 18; 21; twin pregnancy; CELL-FREE DNA; MATERNAL BLOOD; IONA TEST; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.16464
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of secondary screening using non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in a routine NHS setting including test performance, turn-around times (TATs) and no-call (failure to obtain result) rates. To examine the influence of maternal and fetal characteristics on test performance. Design Retrospective cohort. Setting London teaching hospital. Sample A total of 8651 pregnancies undergoing screening for fetal trisomy using NIPT provided by an NHS cell-free DNA screening laboratory - the SAFE laboratory. Methods Screening test evaluation and TATs. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify significant predictors of no-call results and reported by low fetal fraction (<2%), very high fetal fraction (>40%) and processing failure. Main outcome measures Test performance, TATs and no-call rates, factors affecting no-call results. Results Average TAT was 4.0 days (95% CI 4.0-4.2 days). Test sensitivities for trisomies 21 and 13/18 were 98.9% (95% CI 95.9-99.9%) and 90.4% (95% CI 80.0-96.8%), respectively. The overall no-call rate was 32/8651 (0.37%, 95% CI 0.26-0.52%). The overall risk of a no-call result was influenced by gestational age, dichorionic twin pregnancy, history of malignancy and pregnancies affected by trisomy 13/18, but not by maternal weight or use of low-molecular-weight heparin. Conclusions High-throughput NIPT can be effectively embedded into a public health NHS setting. TATs of 4 days and no-calls of <0.5% were well within clinically desirable tolerances. Gestational age, maternal weight, assisted reproductive techniques, use of low-molecular-weight heparin and past history of malignancy did not have major impacts on test no-call rates and should not constitute reasons for withholding the option of NIPT from women. Tweetable abstract Turn-around times of 4 days, no-call (test failure) rates of 0.37% and highly accurate NIPT can be successfully embedded in the NHS.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 446
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21: Consumers' perspectives [J].
Higuchi, Emily C. ;
Sheldon, Jane P. ;
Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J. ;
Yashar, Beverly M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2016, 170 (02) :375-385
[2]   A study on non-invasive prenatal screening for the detection of aneuploidy [J].
Chen, Yao ;
Yang, Fang ;
Shang, Xuan ;
Liu, Siping ;
Li, Meng ;
Zhong, Mei .
GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2022, 93 (09) :716-720
[3]   Non-invasive prenatal screening for foetal trisomy: An assessment of reliability and reporting [J].
Shi, Jiping ;
Tan, Ping ;
Han, Dongsheng ;
Zhang, Runling ;
Li, Jinming ;
Zhang, Rui .
CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 100 :71-77
[4]   Discordant performances of non-invasive prenatal testing for foetal trisomy 21 screening in subgroups of pregnancies [J].
Suo, Feng ;
Wang, Yi ;
Wang, Na ;
Wang, Yawen ;
Liao, Mingming ;
Wang, Jingjing ;
Wang, Chuanxia ;
Zhang, Yan ;
Zhang, Man ;
Zhang, Chu ;
Gu, Maosheng ;
Gou, Lingshan .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 43 (02)
[5]   Cost-effectiveness of ultrasound before non-invasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy [J].
Battarbee, A. N. ;
Vora, N. L. ;
Hardisty, E. E. ;
Stamilio, D. M. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 61 (03) :325-332
[6]   Aneuploidy screening by non-invasive prenatal testing in twin pregnancy [J].
Fosler, L. ;
Winters, P. ;
Jones, K. W. ;
Curnow, K. J. ;
Sehnert, A. J. ;
Bhatt, S. ;
Platt, L. D. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 49 (04) :470-477
[7]   Experiences of non-invasive prenatal screening: A survey study [J].
Cornell, Paige ;
Armstrong, Taylah ;
Fyfe, Rina ;
Mallise, Carly A. ;
Dudding-Byth, Tracy ;
Campbell, Linda E. .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 62 (02) :241-249
[8]   Diagnostic performance and costs of contingent screening models for trisomy 21 incorporating non-invasive prenatal testing [J].
Maxwell, Susannah ;
O'Leary, Peter ;
Dickinson, Jan E. ;
Suthers, Graeme K. .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 57 (04) :432-439
[9]   Non-invasive Fetal Trisomy (NIFTY) test in prenatal diagnosis [J].
Laczmanska, Izabela ;
Stembalska, Agnieszka .
GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2014, 85 (04) :300-303
[10]   A new approach of digital PCR system for non-invasive prenatal screening of trisomy 21 [J].
Lee, Seung Yong ;
Kim, Seung Jun ;
Han, Sung-Hee ;
Park, Joon Soo ;
Choi, Hyo Jung ;
Ahn, Jeong Jin ;
Oh, Moon-Ju ;
Shim, Sung Han ;
Cha, Dong Hyun ;
Hwang, Seung Yong .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2018, 476 :75-80