Secondary non-invasive prenatal screening for fetal trisomy: an effectiveness study in a public health setting

被引:11
|
作者
Guy, G. P. [1 ,2 ]
Hargrave, J. [1 ,3 ]
Dunn, R. [3 ]
Price, K. [3 ]
Short, J. [3 ]
Thilaganathan, B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Fetal Med Unit, Blackshaw Rd, London SW17 0RE, England
[2] St Georges Univ London, Vasc Biol Res Ctr, Mol & Clin Sci Res Inst, London, England
[3] St Georges Univ London, St Georges Antenatal Fetal Evaluat SAFE Lab, St Georges Hosp, London, England
关键词
Cell-free DNA; failed sample; fetal fraction; first-trimester screening; no-call rate; non-invasive prenatal testing; trisomy; 13; 18; 21; twin pregnancy; CELL-FREE DNA; MATERNAL BLOOD; IONA TEST; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.16464
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of secondary screening using non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in a routine NHS setting including test performance, turn-around times (TATs) and no-call (failure to obtain result) rates. To examine the influence of maternal and fetal characteristics on test performance. Design Retrospective cohort. Setting London teaching hospital. Sample A total of 8651 pregnancies undergoing screening for fetal trisomy using NIPT provided by an NHS cell-free DNA screening laboratory - the SAFE laboratory. Methods Screening test evaluation and TATs. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify significant predictors of no-call results and reported by low fetal fraction (<2%), very high fetal fraction (>40%) and processing failure. Main outcome measures Test performance, TATs and no-call rates, factors affecting no-call results. Results Average TAT was 4.0 days (95% CI 4.0-4.2 days). Test sensitivities for trisomies 21 and 13/18 were 98.9% (95% CI 95.9-99.9%) and 90.4% (95% CI 80.0-96.8%), respectively. The overall no-call rate was 32/8651 (0.37%, 95% CI 0.26-0.52%). The overall risk of a no-call result was influenced by gestational age, dichorionic twin pregnancy, history of malignancy and pregnancies affected by trisomy 13/18, but not by maternal weight or use of low-molecular-weight heparin. Conclusions High-throughput NIPT can be effectively embedded into a public health NHS setting. TATs of 4 days and no-calls of <0.5% were well within clinically desirable tolerances. Gestational age, maternal weight, assisted reproductive techniques, use of low-molecular-weight heparin and past history of malignancy did not have major impacts on test no-call rates and should not constitute reasons for withholding the option of NIPT from women. Tweetable abstract Turn-around times of 4 days, no-call (test failure) rates of 0.37% and highly accurate NIPT can be successfully embedded in the NHS.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 446
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Non-invasive Fetal Trisomy (NIFTY) test in prenatal diagnosis
    Laczmanska, Izabela
    Stembalska, Agnieszka
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2014, 85 (04) : 300 - 303
  • [2] Non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21: Consumers' perspectives
    Higuchi, Emily C.
    Sheldon, Jane P.
    Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J.
    Yashar, Beverly M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2016, 170 (02) : 375 - 385
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness of ultrasound before non-invasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy
    Battarbee, A. N.
    Vora, N. L.
    Hardisty, E. E.
    Stamilio, D. M.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 61 (03) : 325 - 332
  • [4] Non-invasive prenatal screening for foetal trisomy: An assessment of reliability and reporting
    Shi, Jiping
    Tan, Ping
    Han, Dongsheng
    Zhang, Runling
    Li, Jinming
    Zhang, Rui
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 100 : 71 - 77
  • [5] A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Screening Strategies Involving Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomy 21
    Wang, Shuxian
    Liu, Kejun
    Yang, Huixia
    Ma, Jingmei
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [6] Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21: replacing invasive testing or replacing screening?
    Verweij, E. J.
    de Boer, Marjon
    van Scheltema, Phebe N. Adama
    van den Oever, Jessica M. E.
    Boon, Elles M. J.
    Oepkes, Dick
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (01) : S313 - S313
  • [7] Fetal fraction evaluation in non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS)
    Hestand, Matthew S.
    Bessem, Mark
    van Rijn, Peter
    de Menezes, Renee X.
    Sie, Daoud
    Bakker, Ingrid
    Boon, Elles M. J.
    Sistermans, Erik A.
    Weiss, Marjan M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 (02) : 198 - 202
  • [8] Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening: Is There Usefulness Beyond Fetal Aneuploidy?
    Shumaker, Shanna
    Phillips, Owen
    Mari, Giancarlo
    Tate, Danielle
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2016, 23 : 139A - 139A
  • [9] Fetal fraction evaluation in non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS)
    Matthew S. Hestand
    Mark Bessem
    Peter van Rijn
    Renee X. de Menezes
    Daoud Sie
    Ingrid Bakker
    Elles M. J. Boon
    Erik A. Sistermans
    Marjan M. Weiss
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2019, 27 : 198 - 202
  • [10] Creating basis for introducing non-invasive prenatal testing in the Estonian public health setting
    Zilina, Olga
    Rekker, Kadri
    Kaplinski, Lauris
    Sauk, Martin
    Paluoja, Priit
    Teder, Hindrek
    Ustav, Eva-Liina
    Tonisson, Neeme
    Reimand, Tiia
    Ridnoi, Konstantin
    Palta, Priit
    Vermeesch, Joris Robert
    Krjutskov, Kaarel
    Kurg, Ants
    Salumets, Andres
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2019, 39 (13) : 1262 - 1268