Comparing Different Partograph Designs for Use in Standard Labor Care: A Pilot Randomized Trial

被引:8
|
作者
Lee, Nigel J. [1 ,2 ]
Neal, Jeremy [3 ]
Lowe, Nancy K. [4 ]
Kildea, Sue V. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Social Work, Midwifery Res Unit, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Mater Res Inst UQ, Mater Hlth Serv, Aubigny Pl,Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Nursing, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Coll Nursing, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
Action line partograph; First stage labor; Labor dystocia; Partograph; Stepped line partograph; Partogram; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; ABNORMAL LABOR; ACTIVE LABOR; LOW-RISK; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; CERVICOGRAPHS; PRIMIGRAVIDAE; ONSET; LINE;
D O I
10.1007/s10995-017-2366-0
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Backgound Partographs are used in many labour settings to provide a pictorial overview of a woman's cervical dilation pattern in the first stage of labor and to alert clinicians to slow progress possibly requiring intervention. Recent reviews called for large trials to establish the efficacy of partographs to improve birth outcomes whilst highlighting issues of clinician compliance with use. Previous studies have also reported issues with participant recruitment related to concerns regarding the possibility of a longer labour. Objectives We sought to compare a standard partograph with an action line, to a newly designed partograph with a stepped line, to determine the feasibility of recruitment to a larger clinical trial. Methods A pragmatic, single-blind randomised trial wherein low-risk, nulliparous women in spontaneous labour at term were randomized to an action-line or stepped-line partograph. First stage labour management was guided by the allocated partograph. Primary outcomes included the proportion of eligible women recruited, reasons for failed recruitment and compliance with partograph use. Secondary outcomes included rates of intervention, mode of birth, maternal and neonatal outcomes. Results Of the 384 potentially eligible participants, 38% (149/384) were approached. Of these 77% (116/149) consented, with 85% (99/116) randomized, only nine women approached (6%) declined to participate. A further 9% (14/149) who were consented antenatally were not eligible at onset of labor and 7% (10/149) of women approached in the birth suite but did not meet the inclusion criteria. Compliance with partograph completion was 65% (action) versus 84% (dystocia line). Conclusions for Practice Participant recruitment to a larger randomized controlled trial comparing new labour management guidelines to standard care is feasible. Effective strategies to improve partograph completion compliance would be required to maintain trial fidelity.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 363
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Restrictive fluids versus standard care in adults with sepsis in the emergency department (REFACED): A multicenter, randomized feasibility trial
    Jessen, Marie K.
    Andersen, Lars W.
    Thomsen, Marie-Louise H.
    Kristensen, Peter
    Hayeri, Wazhma
    Hassel, Ranva E.
    Messerschmidt, Tina G.
    Solling, Christoffer G.
    Perner, Anders
    Petersen, Jens Aage K.
    Kirkegaard, Hans
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 29 (10) : 1172 - 1184
  • [42] Randomized multicentre feasibility trial of intermediate care versus standard ward care after emergency abdominal surgery (InCare trial)
    Vester-Andersen, M.
    Waldau, T.
    Wetterslev, J.
    Moller, M. H.
    Rosenberg, J.
    Jorgensen, L. N.
    Jakobsen, J. C.
    Moller, A. M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 (06) : 619 - 629
  • [43] Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing 2 Different Starting Doses of Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Dhir, Varun
    Singla, Mandeep
    Gupta, Nidhi
    Goya, Palvi
    Sagar, Vinay
    Sharma, Aman
    Khanna, Shefali
    Singh, Surjit
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 36 (07) : 1005 - 1015
  • [44] A patient decision aid for antidepressant use in pregnancy: Pilot randomized controlled trial
    Vigod, Simone N.
    Hussain-Shamsy, Neesha
    Stewart, Donna E.
    Grigoriadis, Sophie
    Metcalfe, Kelly
    Oberlander, Tim F.
    Schram, Carrie
    Taylor, Valerie H.
    Dennis, Cindy-Lee
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2019, 251 : 91 - 99
  • [45] Developing Leadership Capacity for Guideline Use: A Pilot Cluster Randomized Control Trial
    Gifford, Wendy A.
    Davies, Barbara L.
    Graham, Ian D.
    Tourangeau, Ann
    Woodend, A. Kirsten
    Lefebre, Nancy
    WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2013, 10 (01) : 51 - 65
  • [46] Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Hand-Assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Versus Standard Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy
    Dols, Leonienke F. C.
    Kok, Niels F. M.
    d'Ancona, Frank C. H.
    Klop, Karel W. J.
    Tran, T. C. Khe
    Langenhuijsen, Johan F.
    Terkivatan, Tuerkan
    Dor, Frank J. M. F.
    Weimar, Willem
    Dooper, Ine M.
    IJzermans, Jan N. M.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 97 (02) : 161 - 167
  • [47] Use of Asthma APGAR Tools in Primary Care Practices: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
    Yawn, Barbara P.
    Wollan, Peter C.
    Rank, Matthew A.
    Bertram, Susan L.
    Juhn, Young
    Pace, Wilson
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2018, 16 (02) : 100 - 110
  • [48] A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Presacral Nerve Block to Sham Block in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
    Zakhari, Andrew
    Chaikof, Michael
    Kirubarajan, Abirami
    McGavin, Jacob
    Sanders, Ari
    Tomlinson, George
    Sobel, Mara
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2024, 40 (03) : 187 - 193
  • [49] Randomized controlled trial comparing the supraglottic airway to use of an endotracheal tube in sinonasal surgery
    Adams, Austin S.
    Wannemuehler, Todd J.
    Hull, Benjamin
    Wu, Jeffanie
    Chandra, Rakesh K.
    VonWahlde, Kate
    Shotwell, Matthew S.
    Harvey, Stephen
    Higgins, Michael
    McQueen, Kelly
    Turner, Justin H.
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2018, 8 (08) : 877 - 882
  • [50] Comparing ivWatch biosensor to standard care to identify extravasation injuries in the paediatric intensive care: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    McBride, Craig Antony
    Rahiman, Sarfaraz
    Schlapbach, Luregn J.
    Schults, Jessica A.
    Kleidon, Tricia M.
    Kennedy, Melanie
    Paterson, Rebecca S.
    Byrnes, Joshua
    Ware, Robert S.
    Ullman, Amanda Judith
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (02):