Learning style-based teaching harvests a superior comprehension of respiratory physiology

被引:18
作者
Anbarasi, M. [1 ]
Rajkumar, G. [2 ]
Krishnakumar, S. [3 ]
Rajendran, P. [3 ]
Venkatesan, R. [1 ]
Dinesh, T. [1 ]
Mohan, J. [1 ]
Venkidusamy, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Physiol, Perambalur 621113, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Paediat, Perambalur 621113, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Chennai Med Coll Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Physiol, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
VAK learning style; learning style-based teaching; didactic lecture; mechanics of ventilation;
D O I
10.1152/advan.00157.2014
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Students entering medical college generally show vast diversity in their school education. It becomes the responsibility of teachers to motivate students and meet the needs of all diversities. One such measure is teaching students in their own preferred learning style. The present study was aimed to incorporate a learning style-based teaching-learning program for medical students and to reveal its significance and utility. Learning styles of students were assessed online using the visual-auditory-kinesthetic (VAK) learning style self-assessment questionnaire. When respiratory physiology was taught, students were divided into three groups, namely, visual (n = 34), auditory (n = 44), and kinesthetic (n = 28), based on their learning style. A fourth group (the traditional group; n = 40) was formed by choosing students randomly from the above three groups. Visual, auditory, and kinesthetic groups were taught following the appropriate teaching-learning strategies. The traditional group was taught via the routine didactic lecture method. The effectiveness of this intervention was evaluated by a pretest and two posttests, posttest 1 immediately after the intervention and posttest 2 after a month. In posttest 1, one-way ANOVA showed a significant statistical difference (P = 0.005). Post hoc analysis showed significance between the kinesthetic group and traditional group (P = 0.002). One-way ANOVA showed a significant difference in posttest 2 scores (P < 0.0001). Post hoc analysis showed significance between the three learning style-based groups compared with the traditional group [visual vs. traditional groups (p = 0.002), auditory vs. traditional groups (p = 0.03), and Kinesthetic vs. traditional groups (p = 0.001)]. This study emphasizes that teaching methods tailored to students' style of learning definitely improve their understanding, performance, and retrieval of the subject.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 217
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, USING YOUR LEARNING
[2]   Learning styles of first-year medical students attending erciyes university in kayseri, turkey [J].
Baykan, Zeynep ;
Nacar, Melis .
ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2007, 31 (02) :158-160
[3]   Student responses to a hands-on kinesthetic lecture activity for learning about the oxygen carrying capacity of blood [J].
Breckler, Jennifer ;
Yu, Justin R. .
ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2011, 35 (01) :39-47
[4]  
Chislett V, 2005, VAK LEARNING STYLES
[5]  
Fleming N., VARK GUIDE LEARNING
[6]  
Fleming ND, 1995, RES DEV HIGHER ED, V18, P30839
[7]  
Gardner H., 1985, FRAMES MIND THEORY M
[8]   Feeling Laplace [J].
Haddad, Hamilton ;
Brito, Ivana .
ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2011, 35 (01) :97-98
[9]  
James W.B., 1995, NEW DIRECTIONS ADULT, V67, P19, DOI DOI 10.1002/ACE.36719956705
[10]  
Kolb D.A., 1985, Learning Style Inventory: Technical Manual