Process evaluation of the Restore4stroke Self-Management intervention 'Plan Ahead!': a stroke-specific self-management intervention

被引:5
|
作者
Tielemans, Nienke S. u [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Schepers, Vera P. M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Visser-Meily, Johanna M. A. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
van Haastregt, Jolanda C. M. [5 ,6 ]
van Veen, Wendy J. M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
van Stralen, Haike E. [2 ,3 ,4 ,7 ]
van Heugten, Caroline M. [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Sch Mental Hlth & Neurosci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Brain Ctr Rudolf Magnus, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Ctr Excellence Rehabil Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] De Hoogstr Rehabil, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Maastricht Univ, CAPHRI Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Maastricht, Netherlands
[7] Univ Utrecht, Helmholtz Inst, Expt Psychol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[8] Maastricht Univ, Fac Psychol & Neurosci, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Implementation; mixed methods; therapists; participants; self-management; process evaluation; IMPLEMENTATION; EXPERIENCES; DEPRESSION; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1177/0269215515620255
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate whether the self-management intervention was implemented as intended. Additionally, we studied involvement in and satisfaction with the intervention among patients, their partners and therapists. Design: Mixed method, prospective study. Setting: Outpatient facilities of hospitals/rehabilitation centres. Participants: Stroke patients, their partners and therapists from the experimental arm of the Restore4Stroke Self-Management study. Intervention: 'Plan Ahead!' is a 10-week self-management intervention for stroke patients and partners, consisting of seven two-hour group sessions. Proactive action planning, education and peer support are main elements of this intervention. Main measures: Session logs, questionnaires for therapists, patients and their partners, and focus groups. Data analysis: Qualitative data were analysed with thematic analysis supplemented by quasi-statistics. Quantitative data were reported as descriptive statistics. Results: The study sample consisted of 53 patients and 26 partners taking part in the intervention, and all therapists delivering the intervention (N = 19). At least three-quarters of the intervention sessions were attended by 33 patients and 24 partners. On a scale from 1 to 10, patients, partners and therapists rated the intervention with mean scores of 7.5 (SD1.6), 7.8 (SD. 7) and 7.4 (SD. 7), respectively. Peer support was the most frequently appreciated element for participants and therapists. The proactive action planning tool was adequately applied in 76 of the 96 sessions. Conclusion: Although the target audience was reached and both participants and therapists were satisfied with the intervention, the proactive action planning tool that distinguishes the current intervention from existing stroke-specific self-management interventions was only partly implemented according to protocol.
引用
收藏
页码:1175 / 1185
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Complex intervention development for diabetes self-management
    Sturt, J
    Whitlock, S
    Hearnshaw, H
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2006, 54 (03) : 293 - 303
  • [22] A safety self-management intervention for mining operations
    Hickman, JS
    Geller, ES
    JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2003, 34 (03) : 299 - 308
  • [23] Stroke Self-Management Support Improves Survivors' Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectation of Self-Management Behaviors
    Lo, Suzanne H. S.
    Chang, Anne M.
    Chau, Janita P. C.
    STROKE, 2018, 49 (03) : 758 - 760
  • [24] The TOPSY pessary self-management intervention for pelvic organ prolapse: a study protocol for the process evaluation
    Carol Bugge
    Rohna Kearney
    Melanie Dembinsky
    Aethele Khunda
    Margaret Graham
    Wael Agur
    Suzanne Breeman
    Lucy Dwyer
    Andrew Elders
    Mark Forrest
    Kirsteen Goodman
    Karen Guerrero
    Christine Hemming
    Helen Mason
    Doreen McClurg
    Lynn Melone
    John Norrie
    Ranee Thakar
    Suzanne Hagen
    Trials, 21
  • [25] The TOPSY pessary self-management intervention for pelvic organ prolapse: a study protocol for the process evaluation
    Bugge, Carol
    Kearney, Rohna
    Dembinsky, Melanie
    Khunda, Aethele
    Graham, Margaret
    Agur, Wael
    Breeman, Suzanne
    Dwyer, Lucy
    Elders, Andrew
    Forrest, Mark
    Goodman, Kirsteen
    Guerrero, Karen
    Hemming, Christine
    Mason, Helen
    McClurg, Doreen
    Melone, Lynn
    Norrie, John
    Thakar, Ranee
    Hagen, Suzanne
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [26] Self-efficacy and self-management after stroke: a systematic review
    Jones, Fiona
    Riazi, Afsane
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 33 (10) : 797 - 810
  • [27] A systematic review of the effectiveness of stroke self-management programs for improving function and participation outcomes: self-management programs for stroke survivors
    Warner, Grace
    Packer, Tanya
    Villeneuve, Michelle
    Audulv, Asa
    Versnel, Joan
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 37 (23) : 2141 - 2163
  • [28] Assessing the importance of predictors of adherence to a digital self-management intervention for osteoarthritis
    Kiadaliri, Ali
    Dell'Isola, Andrea
    Lohmander, L. Stefan
    Hunter, David J.
    Dahlberg, Leif E.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [29] Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Questionnaire for Assessing Self-Management Behaviors in Stroke Survivors
    Lo, Suzanne Hoi Shan
    Chau, Janita Pak Chun
    Choi, Kai Chow
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2022, 31 (04)
  • [30] RESTORE: an exploratory trial of a web-based intervention to enhance self-management of cancer-related fatigue: findings from a qualitative process evaluation
    Myall, Michelle
    May, Carl R.
    Grimmett, Chloe
    May, Christine M.
    Calman, Lynn
    Richardson, Alison
    Foster, Claire L.
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2015, 15