Cancer incidence in elderly medicare and dually eligible beneficiaries

被引:5
|
作者
Bradley, Cathy J. [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Zhehui [3 ]
Given, Charles W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Hlth Adm, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Massey Canc Ctr, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[3] RTI Int, Behav Hlth Econ Program, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[4] Michigan State Univ, Dept Family Practice, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
cancer; incidence; dual eligible; Medicare; Medicaid;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00855.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. We assessed how Medicaid enrollment and race influence cancer incidence among patients age 65 years and older. Data Sources and Method. Population-based Michigan Tumor Registry was merged with Medicaid eligibility files for 1996 through 2000. All analyses were age-adjusted and gender-specific. We compared cancer incidence in the elderly Medicaid population to the cancer incidence in the Medicare population. We then examined cancer incidence in patients continuously enrolled in Medicaid 12 or more months relative to the incidence in the Medicare population. Principal Findings. When comparing cancer incidence in Medicaid patients without regard to enrollment before diagnosis, the incidence rates of prostate cancer in black men and colorectal cancer in black women were statistically higher relative to the incidence rates in white patients. The overall cancer incidence rate for all cancers combined was statistically significantly higher for black women and men compared with white women and men (incidence rate ratio=1.18 and 1.48, 95 percent confidence interval 1.05-1.32 and 1.28-1.71, respectively). In dually eligible patients enrolled 12 or more months before diagnosis, an excess cancer incident was observed for black patients relative to white patients in every cancer site examined with the exception of lung cancer. Conclusions. Medicaid data in addition to Medicare data revealed patterns of cancer incidence that varied according to Medicaid enrollment and race. These findings suggest that the cancer burden among African Americans and dually eligible patients is substantial.
引用
收藏
页码:1768 / 1779
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dually eligible Medicare beneficiaries
    Murray, LA
    Shatto, AE
    HEALTH CARE FINANCING REVIEW, 1998, 20 (02): : 131 - 140
  • [2] Colon Cancer Treatment Costs for Medicare and Dually Eligible Beneficiaries
    Luo, Zhehui
    Bradley, Cathy J.
    Dahman, Bassam A.
    Gardiner, Joseph C.
    HEALTH CARE FINANCING REVIEW, 2009, 31 (01): : 35 - 50
  • [3] Effect of Medicare advantage payments on dually eligible Medicare beneficiaries
    Atherly, A
    Dowd, BE
    HEALTH CARE FINANCING REVIEW, 2005, 26 (03): : 93 - 104
  • [4] End of life Medicare and medicaid expenditures for dually eligible beneficiaries
    Liu, Korbin
    Wiener, Joshua M.
    Niefeld, Marlene R.
    HEALTH CARE FINANCING REVIEW, 2006, 27 (04): : 95 - 110
  • [5] IMPACT OF TRANSITION TO PART D FOR DUALLY ELIGIBLE AGED MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES
    Bishop, C. E.
    Gilden, D. M.
    Lee, A.
    Thomas, C.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2011, 51 : 402 - 402
  • [6] State Initiatives to Integrate the Medicare and Medicaid Programs for Dually Eligible Beneficiaries
    Grabowski, David C.
    Bramson, Jeffrey
    GENERATIONS-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING, 2008, 32 (03): : 54 - 60
  • [7] Research issues: Dually eligible Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries, challenges and opportunities
    Clark, WD
    Hulbert, MM
    HEALTH CARE FINANCING REVIEW, 1998, 20 (02): : 1 - 10
  • [8] State payment limitations on medicare cost-sharing: Impact on dually eligible beneficiaries
    Mitchell, JB
    Haber, SG
    INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 2004, 41 (04) : 391 - 400
  • [9] DISABILITY BENEFICIARIES ELIGIBLE FOR MEDICARE
    RUTHER, M
    SOCIAL SECURITY BULLETIN, 1974, 37 (07) : 28 - 33
  • [10] Care Coordination for Dually Eligible Medicare-Medicaid Beneficiaries Under the Affordable Care Act
    Grabowski, David C.
    JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY, 2012, 24 (02) : 221 - 232