Science and society - Human dignity: a guide to policy making in the biotechnology era?

被引：44

作者：

Caulfield, T ^{[1
]}

Brownsword, R

机构：

[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Law, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H5, Canada

[2] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H5, Canada

[3] Kings Coll London, Sch Law, London WC2R 2LS, England

来源：

NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS | 2006年 / 7卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1038/nrg1744

中图分类号：

Q3 [遗传学];

学科分类号：

071007 ; 090102 ;

摘要：

This article explores the ways in which human dignity is used in debates about controversial biotechnologies, including biobanks, human gene patents, stem cell research and human cloning. Increasingly, human dignity is used as a form of general condemnation and as blanket justification for regulatory restraint. However, this use of human dignity marks a significant departure from the traditional, human-rights informed view of human dignity that has dominated bioethics debates for decades. In addition, on its own, it stands as dubious justification for policies that are aimed at constraining controversial biotechnologies.

引用

页码：72 / 76

页数：5

共 46 条

[1]

[Anonymous], **NON-TRADITIONAL**

[2]

Arnason G A., 2004, Blood and data: Ethical, legal, and social aspects of human genetic databases

[3]

Austin Melissa A, 2003, Community Genet, V6, P37, DOI 10.1159/000069544

[4]

Australian Law Reform Commission, 2004, 99 ALRC

[5]

Beyleveld D, 1998, Mod Law Rev, V61, P661

[6]

BEYLEVELD D, 2000, PHARM MED BIOTECHNOL, P157

[7]

Beyleveld Deryck., 2001, HUMAN DIGNITY BIOETH

[8]

Brown B, 2001, J LAW MED ETHICS, V29, P166

[9]

Brownsword R, 2001, JB RECHT ETHIK ANN R, V9, P3

[10]

BROWNSWORD R, 2004, INT C PAT BIOT

← 1 2 3 4 5 →