Algorithms for enhancing public health utility of national causes-of-death data

被引:321
作者
Naghavi, Mohsen [1 ]
Makela, Susanna [1 ]
Foreman, Kyle [1 ]
O'Brien, Janaki [1 ]
Pourmalek, Farshad [1 ]
Lozano, Rafael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Inst Hlth Metr & Evaluat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
POPULATION HEALTH METRICS | 2010年 / 8卷
关键词
CLINICAL DIAGNOSES; UNITED-STATES; STATISTICS; MORTALITY; RELIABILITY; REGIONS;
D O I
10.1186/1478-7954-8-9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Coverage and quality of cause-of-death (CoD) data varies across countries and time. Valid, reliable, and comparable assessments of trends in causes of death from even the best systems are limited by three problems: a) changes in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) over time; b) the use of tabulation lists where substantial detail on causes of death is lost; and c) many deaths assigned to causes that cannot or should not be considered underlying causes of death, often called garbage codes (GCs). The Global Burden of Disease Study and the World Health Organization have developed various methods to enhance comparability of CoD data. In this study, we attempt to build on these approaches to enhance the utility of national cause-of-death data for public health analysis. Methods: Based on careful consideration of 4,434 country-years of CoD data from 145 countries from 1901 to 2008, encompassing 743 million deaths in ICD versions 1 to 10 as well as country-specific cause lists, we have developed a public health-oriented cause-of-death list. These 56 causes are organized hierarchically and encompass all deaths. Each cause has been mapped from ICD-6 to ICD-10 and, where possible, they have also been mapped to the International List of Causes of Death 1-5. We developed a typology of different classes of GCs. In each ICD revision, GCs have been identified. Target causes to which these GCs should be redistributed have been identified based on certification practice and/or pathophysiology. Proportionate redistribution, statistical models, and expert algorithms have been developed to redistribute GCs to target codes for each age-sex group. Results: The fraction of all deaths assigned to GCs varies tremendously across countries and revisions of the ICD. In general, across all country-years of data available, GCs have declined from more than 43% in ICD-7 to 24% in ICD-10. In some regions, such as Australasia, GCs in 2005 are as low as 11%, while in some developing countries, such as Thailand, they are greater than 50%. Across different age groups, the composition of GCs varies tremendously - three classes of GCs steadily increase with age, but ambiguous codes within a particular disease chapter are also common for injuries at younger ages. The impact of redistribution is to change the number of deaths assigned to particular causes for a given age-sex group. These changes alter ranks across countries for any given year by a number of different causes, change time trends, and alter the rank order of causes within a country. Conclusions: By mapping CoD through different ICD versions and redistributing GCs, we believe the public health utility of CoD data can be substantially enhanced, leading to an increased demand for higher quality CoD data from health sector decision-makers.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Health Statistics 4 - From data to policy: good practices and cautionary tales
    AbouZahr, Carla
    Adjei, Sam
    Kanchanachitra, Churnrurtai
    [J]. LANCET, 2007, 369 (9566) : 1039 - 1046
  • [2] Do we really know the cause of death of the very old? Comparison between official mortality statistics and cohort study classification
    Alperovitch, Annick
    Bertrand, Marion
    Jougla, Eric
    Vidal, Jean-Sebastien
    Ducimetiere, Pierre
    Helmer, Catherine
    Ritchie, Karen
    Pavillon, Gerard
    Tzourio, Christophe
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 24 (11) : 669 - 675
  • [3] Anderson R N, 2001, Natl Vital Stat Rep, V49, P1
  • [4] [Anonymous], WHO MORT DAT BAS DOC
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2002, GLOBAL BURDEN DIS 20
  • [6] Bouvier-Colle M-H, 2004, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), V33, P421, DOI 10.1016/S0368-2315(04)96550-7
  • [7] THE ROLE OF DIAGNOSTIC INCONSISTENCY IN CHANGING RATES OF OCCURRENCE FOR CORONARY HEART-DISEASE
    BURNAND, B
    FEINSTEIN, AR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (09) : 929 - 940
  • [8] Validation of death certificate diagnosis for coronary heart disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study
    Coady, SA
    Sorlie, PD
    Cooper, LS
    Folsom, AR
    Rosamond, WD
    Conwill, DE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (01) : 40 - 50
  • [9] Underreporting of pregnancy-related mortality in the United States and Europe
    Deneux-Tharaux, C
    Berg, C
    Bouvier-Colle, MH
    Gissler, M
    Harper, M
    Nannini, A
    Alexander, S
    Wildman, K
    Breart, G
    Buekens, P
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 106 (04) : 684 - 692
  • [10] Farr W, 1840, 2 ANN REPORT REGISTR