Time is Money! Influence on Operating Theater and Sterilization Times of Patient-specific Cutting Guides and Single-use Instrumentation for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Full Factorial Design of 136 Patients

被引:0
作者
Teissier, Victoria [1 ,3 ]
Biau, David [1 ]
Hamadouche, Moussa [1 ]
Talon, Damien [2 ]
Anract, Philippe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris, Hop Cochin, APHP, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Paris, France
[2] Cochin Teaching Hosp, Dept Pharm, Paris, France
[3] Cochin Teaching Hosp, 27 Rue Faubourg St Jacques, F-75014 Paris, France
来源
ARTHROPLASTY TODAY | 2022年 / 18卷
关键词
Arthroplasty; Single-use; Patient-specific; Efficiency; CONVENTIONAL INSTRUMENTATION; HIP; MULTICENTER; OUTCOMES; BENEFIT; BLOCKS; TKA;
D O I
10.1016/j.artd.2022.09.004
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Patient-specific cutting guides (PSGs) and single-use disposable instrumentation (SUI) have emerged as potential beneficial innovations for total knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of PSG and SUI for total knee arthroplasty on operating room (OR) and sterilization times.Methods A monocentric, prospective, interventional, full factorial design study, including 136 patients, compared patient-specific (PSG, n = 68) to conventional cutting guides (n = 68) and SUI (n = 68) to conventional instrumentation (CVI, n = 68). In the OR, we recorded the number of instrument trays, operating time, and room occupancy time. In the central sterile services department, the total sterilization duration was assessed. The primary outcome was operating time and sterilization duration. Secondary outcomes were difference in the number of trays, Oxford Knee Score, and postoperative mechanical axis.Results The median operating time was 80 minutes (Q1-Q3: 73-90) and was significantly increased for SUI compared to that for CVI (+5 minutes, P = .0072). The median sterilization duration was 1261 minutes (Q1-Q3: 934-1603). It was significantly in favor of SUI (936 minutes) over CVI (1565 minutes) (+629 minutes, P < .0001). The total number of instrument trays was 404 for 136 patients: 252 for CVI and 152 for SUI (P < .0001) and 189 for PSG and 215 for conventional cutting guides (P = .0006). There was no significant difference in OKS (P = .86) nor in the postoperative alignment which was between 177 degrees and 183 degrees (75% patients, P = .24).Conclusions SUI lowers the number of instrument trays and sterilization duration. PSG is not associated with significant OR or sterilization time reduction. The use of SUI could reduce the risk of noncompliance of instrument trays.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 102
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] A comparison of patient-specific and conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty A MULTICENTRE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Abane, L.
    Anract, P.
    Boisgard, S.
    Descamps, S.
    Courpied, J. P.
    Hamadouche, M.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2015, 97B (01) : 56 - 63
  • [2] Can a Single-Use and Patient-Specific Instrumentation Be Reliably Used in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Multicenter Controlled Study
    Abane, Laurent
    Zaoui, Amine
    Anract, Philippe
    Lefevre, Nicolas
    Herman, Serge
    Hamadouche, Moussa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (07) : 2111 - 2118
  • [3] No Benefit of Patient-specific Instrumentation in TKA on Functional and Gait Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    Parratte, Sebastien
    Blanc, Guillaume
    Ollivier, Matthieu
    Pomero, Vincent
    Viehweger, Elke
    Argenson, Jean-Noel A.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (08) : 2468 - 2476
  • [4] AOA Australian Orthopaedic Association, 2017, National joint replacement registry. Hip, Knee and Shoulder Arthroplasty.
  • [5] Using Bayesian statistics to estimate the likelihood a new trial will demonstrate the efficacy of a new treatment
    Biau, David J.
    Boulezaz, Samuel
    Casabianca, Laurent
    Hamadouche, Moussa
    Anract, Philippe
    Chevret, Sylvie
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [6] A Bundle Protocol to Reduce the Incidence of Periprosthetic Joint Infections After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Single-Center Experience
    Bullock, Matthew W.
    Brown, Matthew L.
    Bracey, Daniel N.
    Langfitt, Maxwell K.
    Shields, John S.
    Lang, Jason E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (04) : 1067 - 1073
  • [7] Computer-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Currently of No Proven Clinical Benefit: A Systematic Review
    Burnett, R. Stephen J.
    Barrack, Robert L.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 471 (01) : 264 - 276
  • [8] A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement
    Chareancholvanich, K.
    Narkbunnam, R.
    Pornrattanamaneewong, C.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2013, 95B (03) : 354 - 359
  • [9] Total Knee Arthroplasty Volume, Utilization, and Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries, 1991-2010
    Cram, Peter
    Lu, Xin
    Kates, Stephen L.
    Singh, Jasvinder A.
    Li, Yue
    Wolf, Brian R.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 308 (12): : 1227 - 1236
  • [10] Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty - A qualitative and systematic review of the literature
    Ethgen, O
    Bruyere, O
    Richy, F
    Dardennes, C
    Reginster, JY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (05) : 963 - 974