Characteristics of velocity ambiguity for CINRAD-SA Doppler weather radars

被引:16
作者
Chu, Zhigang [1 ]
Yin, Yan [1 ]
Gu, Songshan [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Key Lab Meteorol Disaster, Minist Educ, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, China Meteorol Adm, Key Lab Aerosol Cloud Precipitat, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Weather radar; quality control; radial velocity; velocity ambiguity; velocity dealiasing; statistical characterization; DEALIASING SCHEME;
D O I
10.1007/s13143-014-0010-0
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The velocity ambiguity in Doppler weather radars has inhibited the application of wind field data for long time. One effective solution is software-based velocity dealiasing algorithm. In this paper, in order to better design, optimize and validate velocity dealiasing algorithms for CINRAD-SA, data from operational radars were used to statistically characterize velocity ambiguity. The analyzed characteristic parameters included occurrence rate, and inter-station, inter-type, temporal, and spatial distributions. The results show that 14.9% of cloud-rain files and 0.3% of clear-air files from CINRADSA radars are ambiguous. It is also found that echoes of weak convections have the highest occurrence rate of velocity ambiguity than any other cloud types, and the probability of ambiguity is higher in winter than in summer. A detailed inspection of the occurrence of ambiguity in various cases indicates that ambiguous points usually occur in areas with an elevation angle of 6.0A degrees, an azimuth of 70A degrees or 250A degrees, radial distance of 50-60 km, and height of 5-6 km, and that 99.4% of ambiguous points are in the 1st-folding interval. Suggestions for performing dealiasing at different locations and different time points are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 227
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, DOPPLER RADAR WEATHE, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-221422-6.50010-3
[2]  
Bargen D. W., 1980, P 19 C RAD MET MIAM, P278
[3]  
Bergen W. R., 1988, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, V5, P305, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(1988)005<0305:TATDDA>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]  
Boren S. Z., 1986, P 23 C RAD MET SNOWM, P107
[6]  
Browning KA., 1968, J APPL METEOROL, V7, P105, DOI [DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1968)0072.0.CO
[7]  
2, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1968)007<0105:TDOKPO>2.0.CO
[8]  
2]
[9]  
EILTS MD, 1990, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V7, P118, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(1990)007<0118:EDODVU>2.0.CO
[10]  
2