Relation between self-esteem and socially desirable responding and the role of socially desirable responding in the relation between self-esteem and performance

被引:229
作者
Huang, Chiungjung [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Changhua Univ Educ, Grad Inst Educ, Changhua 50058, Taiwan
关键词
Self-esteem; Socially desirable responding; Meta-analysis; IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT; PERSONALITY; SCALE; VALIDITY; COMPETENCE; VALIDATION; DECEPTION; ASSOCIATIONS; ACHIEVEMENT; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1007/s10212-012-0134-5
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This investigation examines the relation between self-esteem and socially desirable responding by integrating previous findings via a meta-analysis. In 55 studies containing 73 independent samples (N = 11,901), the correlation between self-esteem and Impression Management was weak, that between self-esteem and Self-Deceptive Enhancement was from moderate to strong, and that between self-esteem and omnibus socially desirable responding was moderate based on Cohen's guidelines (1988). The effects of all moderators, including the measures of self-esteem and socially desirable responding, and mean sample age and sample gender, on the relation between self-esteem and socially desirable responding were non-significant. Socially desirable responding did not function as a useful suppressor or spurious variable in the relation between self-esteem and performance.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 683
页数:21
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, METAANALYSIS PROCEDU
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1957, SOCIAL DESIRABILITY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, THESIS VIRGINIA POLY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1983, Journal of Educational Statistics, DOI [DOI 10.2307/1164923, DOI 10.3102/1076998600800215]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Manual for the self perception profile for children
[6]   CAUSAL PRIORITY OF SOCIAL DESIRABILITY OVER SELF-CONCEPT - CROSS-LAGGED CORRELATION ANALYSIS [J].
ARLIN, M .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1976, 33 (03) :267-272
[7]   The role of self-esteem in affiliation [J].
Astra, RL ;
Singg, S .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 134 (01) :15-22
[8]  
Bernard L.C., 1996, Assessment, V3, P115
[10]  
Breckler S. J., 1982, INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENC