Luciferase Reporter Gene Assay on Human, Murine and Rat Histamine H4 Receptor Orthologs: Correlations and Discrepancies between Distal and Proximal Readouts

The investigation of the (patho) physiological role of the histamine H-4 receptor (H4R) and its validation as a possible drug target in translational animal models are compromised by distinct species-dependent discrepancies regarding potencies and receptor subtype selectivities of the pharmacological tools. Such differences were extremely pronounced in case of proximal readouts, e. g. [P-32]GTPase or [S-35]GTP gamma S binding assays. To improve the predictability of in vitro investigations, the aim of this study was to establish a reporter gene assay for human, murine and rat H(4)Rs, using bioluminescence as a more distal readout. For this purpose a cAMP responsive element (CRE) controlled luciferase reporter gene assay was established in HEK293T cells, stably expressing the human (h), the mouse (m) or the rat (r) H4R. The potencies and efficacies of 23 selected ligands (agonists, inverse agonists and antagonists) were determined and compared with the results obtained from proximal readouts. The potencies of the examined ligands at the human H4R were consistent with reported data from [P-32]GTPase or [S-35]GTP gamma S binding assays, despite a tendency toward increased intrinsic efficacies of partial agonists. The differences in potencies of individual agonists at the three H4R orthologs were generally less pronounced compared to more proximal readouts. In conclusion, the established reporter gene assay is highly sensitive and reliable. Regarding discrepancies compared to data from functional assays such as [P-32]GTPase and [S-35]GTP gamma S binding, the readout may reflect multifactorial causes downstream from G-protein activation, e. g. activation/amplification of or cross-talk between different signaling pathways.