Evaluation of three Arcobacter selective agars for selective enumeration of Arcobacter butzleri in beef

被引:6
作者
Ahmed, Rafath [1 ]
Balamurugan, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Guelph, ON, Canada
关键词
Arcobacter butzleri; Arcobacter selective agars; Inhibition of indigenous beef microflora; SP-NOV; MULTIPLEX PCR; GROUND PORK; CAMPYLOBACTER; SPP; PREVALENCE; SKIRROWII; CARCASSES; SPOILAGE; POULTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodres.2013.02.029
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Arcobacter spp. is an emerging foodborne pathogen due to increasing association with foods of animal origin. A number of Arcobacter selective broths and agars are available for the enrichment, isolation and detection of Arcobacter spp. from food, fecal and environmental sources. However, studies have not examined the specificity of different Arcobacter selective agars for selective enumeration of Arcobacter spp. in beef. The purpose of this study is to determine which of the three published Arcobacter selective agars (Houf, JM and AC agar) can provide acceptable counts while inhibiting the growth of selected indigenous meat microflora during direct plating. Houf and AC agar were able to supress the growth of all selected indigenous meat microflora tested while JM agar supported the growth of Leuconostoc carnosum. In the Arcobacter butzleri recovery efficiency trial, Houf, JM and AC agar achieved recovery rates between 81-98%, 12-52% and 77-97%, respectively, in comparison to TSA. JM and AC agar were unable to supress the growth of indigenous beef microflora from temperature abused retail ground beef even at dilutions as high as 10(-6). Houf agar was able to effectively suppress indigenous beef microflora at dilutions as low as 10(-1). This study showed that Houf agar is more suitable compared to JM or AC agar for use in meat challenge studies as a direct plating agar for enumeration of A. butzleri. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 525
页数:4
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Evaluation of a new arcobacter enrichment medium and comparison with two media developed for enrichment of Campylobacter spp. [J].
Atabay, HI ;
Corry, JEL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 41 (01) :53-58
[2]  
Atabay HI, 1998, J APPL MICROBIOL, V84, P1007, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00437.x
[3]   Incidence of Arcobacter spp. in Poultry: Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis and PCR Differentiation [J].
Atanassova, Viktoria ;
Kessen, Volker ;
Reich, Felix ;
Klein, Guenter .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2008, 71 (12) :2533-2536
[4]   Bacterial spoilage of meat and cured meat products [J].
Borch, E ;
KantMuermans, ML ;
Blixt, Y .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 33 (01) :103-120
[5]   Prevalence of Arcobacter in Meat and Shellfish [J].
Collado, Luis ;
Guarro, Josep ;
Figueras, Maria Jose .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2009, 72 (05) :1102-1106
[6]   Detection of Arcobacter spp in ground pork by modified plating methods [J].
Collins, CI ;
Wesley, IV ;
Murano, EA .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1996, 59 (05) :448-452
[7]   Arcobacter contamination on pre- and post-chilled bovine carcasses and in minced beef at retail [J].
De Smet, S. ;
De Zutter, L. ;
Van Hende, J. ;
Houf, K. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 108 (01) :299-305
[8]   Arcobacter Population Dynamics in Pigs on Farrow-to-Finish Farms [J].
De Smet, Sarah ;
De Zutter, Lieven ;
Debruyne, Lies ;
Vangroenweghe, Frederic ;
Vandamme, Peter ;
Houf, Kurt .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 77 (05) :1732-1738
[9]  
deBoer E, 1996, LETT APPL MICROBIOL, V23, P64
[10]   ISOLATION OF SPIRILLUM-VIBRIO-LIKE ORGANISMS FROM BOVINE FETUSES [J].
ELLIS, WA ;
NEILL, SD ;
OBRIEN, JJ ;
FERGUSON, HW ;
HANNA, J .
VETERINARY RECORD, 1977, 100 (21) :451-452